Member Info for StockMaiden

Have just filtered Supersport too.

I have filtered Ezhik. He is here to disrupt the board and to spread false information.

Just a quick recap of the geographic location and the potentials at play here.

There is The ‘Montana Helium Fairway’ illustration on the company website.

A helium system extending from Saskatchewan to Wyoming. If you look at the project named IngomaDome (our project) and next to that is Root, containing 3.9% Helium, and the surrounding projects has an average of just below or above 1% Helium, and another at 2.2%.

By the companies words, Helium grades of 0.9% – 1.3% considered highly commercial.

Ezhik,

I answered your question yesterday at 18.34.

Another one of your attempts to cause confusion?

Amsden + Flathead (distribute the 6% however you want but it doesn't take away the fact that Charles has 94% of the resource)

GEX have confirmed pretty much confirmed this morning there will be no drilling this December.

It just highlights it's no easy task getting all the legal paperwork, the crew and drilling equipment on site.

By comparison, HEX in my opinion, has been doing a decent job so far. They listed in April 2024, and already conducted the initial phrase of drilling for the Amsden surface.

We also have the Rudyard project to commence shortly.

The market have not received the recent HEX news well

There are 3 parts to the well. You can also refer to the illustration on the company website.

Amsden - upper

Charles - middle

Flathead - lower

They have drilled Amsden which makes up 6% of the well. Identified Helium, although not the initial amount that they had expected, but in conjunction with Charles / Flathead, Amsden alone can generate an extra income of $1,000,000 per well. You wouldn't get $1,000,000 per well income if there wasn't an adequate level of Helium.

They always said Charles would be the primary target by commercial standards. I would say the Helium indication in the surface Amsden level is good data to further support Helium is at the lower levels.

If people had actually listened to the recent interview, 2mins 49 seconds into the video, here are David Minchin's (HEX Geologists)exact words:

"That's where 94% of the resource is"

Referring to Charles

The link to the interview is below.

https:

//youtu.be/X-6Lv5aWKag?si=nrRykwR8q3PpOZwu

I don't know why so many people are writing this off when clearly, only Amsden has been drilled and tested, making up 6% of the well and already showing Helium.

This to me is good news.

As always, DYOR

Rudyard project to commence testing on Darwin #1. Testing is due to commence on 2 December 2024

Discovery: The Rudyard Project is a large-scale domal anticline with proven helium gas up to 1.3% Helium (“He”) flowed to the surface from two adjacent wells.

Contingent Resources: The project holds approximately 484,000 Mcf (0.48 Bcf) of gross helium resources, with an estimated in-situ value exceeding $250 million at a helium price of $550/Mcf.

Upside Potential: The untested Dry Creek Formation within the Rudyard Project offers opportunity to expand the gross helium resource to 600,000Mcf.

Infrastructure Advantage: Existing infrastructure, including the BNSF rail line and 3-phase power, supports cost-effective development.

Theofficecat,

"Stockmaiden it is nothing UNLESS they can get Charles or Flathead to flow. By no means anywhere near guaranteed"

Try telling us something we don't already know will ya.

Nobody had ever said this is a guaranteed but I refer you back to the RNS for like the 12th time, Amsden data had identified Helium.

Why would they put this in an RNS if there were nothing as you suggest.

"At sustained flow rates of 4,000Mcf/day raw gas and a helium sales price of $500/Mcf production from the Amsden would generate pre-tax cashflow of circa $1,000,000 per well per year"

The Amsden level have indicated the existence of Helium, and that is a good sign indicating further Helium concentration at the lower levels, namely Charles and Flathead.

A reminder that Charles is where 94% of where the resource is at by DM words.

Supersport,

"I don't trust this company after the Pod cast .

I will only trade it if it goes to IPO 10p"

Well that's strange. You don't trust the company but you have set a target to buy. That's contradicting isn't it.

The truth is coming out. You just want in at a lower price. It's been your agenda all along.

Supersport,

you say: "6 % non viable means thus far they have "Nothing"

Amsden alone can generate an extra income of $1,000,000 per well on conjunction with Charles / Flathead.

That's not nothing is it. They have clearly identified Helium.

The only person trying to deceive is you.

Ezhik,

That's an easy answer.

Amsden + Flathead (distribute the 6% however you want but it doesn't take away the fact that Charles has 94% of the resource)

Even better, perhaps Amsden only hold 1% and flathead has the remaining 5%.

Video Interview:

2mins 49 seconds into the video, here are David Minchin's (HEX Geologists)exact words:

"That's where 94% of the resource is"

Referring to Charles

The link to the interview is below.

https:

//youtu.be/X-6Lv5aWKag?si=nrRykwR8q3PpOZwu

There is The ‘Montana Helium Fairway’ illustration on the company website.

A helium system extending from Saskatchewan to Wyoming. If you look at the project named IngomaDome (our project) and next to that is Root, containing 3.9% Helium, and the surrounding projects has an average of just below or above 1% Helium, and another at 2.2%.

By the companies words, Helium grades of 0.9% – 1.3% considered highly commercial.

Heard of the saying you are innocent until proven guilty? If only people had a bit of patience and wait for the results instead of clogging the board with baseless speculations.

I think the desperate one here is you and your crew, having factual posts removed.

There is The ‘Montana Helium Fairway’ illustration on the company website.

A helium system extending from Saskatchewan to Wyoming. If you look at the project named IngomaDome (our project) and next to that is Root, containing 3.9% Helium, and the surrounding projects has an average of just below or above 1% Helium, and another at 2.2%.

The point I am trying to make is the project is being drilled at an Helium rich surrounding.

The people that are calling HEX a dud based on 6% of the well drilled are not correctly interpreting the data, or what David Minchin had said.

The purpose of the drill is to gather further samples to be tested, and until that is completed nobody knows for sure what % of Helium could be in the Charles / Flathead formations.

As mentioned in my last post, the geographic surroundings, and recent data recovered from the Amsden strongly support the identification of Helium.

Once we drill deeper into the Charles / Flathead formations, there will be a much more accurate interpretation from the results.

DYOR

To further add to my last post, there is The ‘Montana Helium Fairway’ illustration on the company website.

A helium system extending from Saskatchewan to Wyoming. If you look at the project named IngomaDome (our project) and next to that is Root, containing 3.9% Helium, and the surrounding projects has an average of just below or above 1% Helium.

The point I am trying to make is the project is being drilled at a Helium rich surrounding.

The people that are calling HEX a dud based on 6% of the well drilled are not interpreting what the data, or what David Minchin had said.

The purpose of the drill is to gather further samples to be tested, and until that is completed nobody knows for sure what % of Helium could be in the Charles / Flathead formations.

As mentioned in my last post, the geographic surroundings, and recent data recovered from the Amsden strongly support the identification of Helium.

Once we drill deeper into the Charles / Flathead formations, there will be a much more accurate interpretation from the results.

I have re-posted because forces at work are trying to get factual information removed. There are posts from this morning that have been removed.

The market have not received the HEX news well or that some people are too lazy to do their research.

There are 3 parts to the well. You can also refer to the illustration on the company website.

Amsden - upper

Charles - middle

Flathead - lower

They have drilled Amsden which makes up 6% of the well. Identified Helium, although not the initial amount that they had expected, but in conjunction with Charles / Flathead, Amsden alone can generate an extra income of $1,000,000 per well. You wouldn't get $1,000,000 per well income if there wasn't an adequate level of Helium.

They always said Charles would be the primary target by commercial standards. I would say the Helium indication in the surface Amsden level is good data to further support Helium is at the lower levels.

If people had actually listened to the recent interview, 2mins 49 seconds into the video, here are David Minchin's (HEX Geologists)exact words:

"That's where 94% of the resource is"

Referring to Charles

The link to the interview is below.

https:

//youtu.be/X-6Lv5aWKag?si=nrRykwR8q3PpOZwu

I don't know why so many people are writing this off when clearly, only Amsden has been drilled and tested, making up 6% of the well and already showing Helium.

This to me is good news.

As always, DYOR.

If people had actually listened to the interview, in 2mins 49 seconds into the video, here are David Minchin's exact words:

"That's where 94% of the resource is"

Referring to Charles

The link to the interview is below. Listen to the whole interview and you know who which side is speaking the truth.

https:

//youtu.be/X-6Lv5aWKag?si=nrRykwR8q3PpOZwu

Wouldn't it be difficult to get a fund raise from the market in this climate?

But you haven't even read the RNS.

It clearly says they have identified Helium

Each to their own choice! Bye

People are expecting the SP to go up after the presentation?