Member Info for Stackhigh

Red, you tell people they should actively research and manage their investment to always end up in huge profit like you, but there's a problem. Other people are actually trading real shares, rather than the pretend shares you and your wife claim to trade (always comfortably after the event and sometimes claiming other people's trades).

Stick to the ellipsis pushing, or reporting Christmas day trades in Canada as significant 🤣

The very fact he's still posting is mad- seemingly either doesn't understand the depths of his own stupidity or is comfortable with them. The same guy who doesn't know what his thermometer measures expects people to listen to his contradictory ramblings?

How's your homework, slug? Got any data for us? You said it would be a week over a week ago - are we to assume the penny is finally dropping with you?

2025 looks possible. No one is moving anytime soon for the same reasons they haven't yet, and were never going to in 2023. Plus the SP has plenty lower it can go. The amateurs on this board don't understand m&a or solg (for proof, see for and red's near-constant references to other buy outs that are cheese to our chalk) so I'd ignore them when they claim it's sooner.

As with all of my investments (bar a couple of cars) I'm well up here and in no hurry to close. That's the nice thing about having an income whilst investing- I can wait. Red is old and clearly sick, well down and desperate for an exit. Fort is a wannabe trader who can't decide when to ramp and when not- my guess is he got carried away during lockdowns.

SM- was I best ignored last year when, in the face of a lot of tosh about an imminent TO, I confidently and accurately assured everyone there would be no such TO in 2023?

I may be a thorn in the side of rampers like Fort and liars like slug, but I'm not a simple troll like NAL. I understand the company and the sector, and what I say comes to pass.

When he's not failing to ramp with ellipses, Red's reminding us that he doesn't understand how trades are reported. I've explained it to him at least twice before. It's not that hard to understand: even slug once agreed that my explanation was clear, and he can barely operate a keyboard!

"Holding above 11.20...new support level...?

12.50 then 14 next targets..."

This aged well. Do you think red get paid by the ellipsis?

Buying stops, profit taking starts, idiots here go quiet. It's a dance as old as time. All the attempts at inducing FOMO are quickly buried in new claptrap and slug saying stupid, demonstrably false nonsense

Shame no money can buy you a brain, hey scarecrow slug? How's your homework? 🤣

I'll take that as an admission of defeat from the 'big man on campus' and we can all forget about his latest embarrassment. Poor chap- I think people like him only lash out because they are desperately sad inside. He has my sympathy, but he doesn't need it in his big car/house/many girlfriends/huge investment... 😅

Merry Christmas all

So by slug's logic, 'men' deserve credit if they refer to their skin colour as "the superior pigmentation" and to Chinese nationals by outdated slang, but not if they call out this kind of behavior? Sounds about right. Grrr, what manly man he continues to prove himself to be. I'm sure we're all quivering from the testosterone...

Meanwhile, he still hasn't climbed out of his embarrassing situation RE: false facts. I visit here once, maybe twice a day and seemingly every time there's a new brain fart from him.

I've really hurt you, haven't I slug? No animosity on my part, I assure you. Just don't want you getting confused and making demonstrably false claims here.

How's you data mining going? Ready to accept that the UK's comparative GDP fell under Thatcher, as I proved with data, or still claiming your 'recall' is better than the world bank/IMC/UN/US gov? Hope you're not losing too much sleep knowing you embarrassed yourself here (again).

See you're still posting, slug, despite your crushing lack of credibility. How's your homework coming along?

Not quite everyone got what they wanted.

Fort (absolute joke of a ramper-turned-pessimist with predictably terrible timing) wanted SC out. How did that go, Fort? Let me just check that vote tally again...

Good to see the kidnap half life is getting shorter in Ecuador.

Slug, ready to admit your lies yet? Or still pretending the dog ate your homework?

Red filling this board with claptrap and ellipses is rarely a harbinger of good news. It usually proceeds a (fictional) top up followed by an (impossible) sale at profit.

'you'd get your comeuppance'?! Ha!! That made me laugh. Genuinely very funny from a frustrated keyboard warrior. Do you always win these imaginary fights you have in your mind? Will you 'give me what for'?! Take me outside for fisticuffs?!

I'll keep calling out your inaccurate posts. It clearly makes you unhappy, but being right gives me a lovely warm feeling. You fail to back up your lies and threaten comeuppance (!). I substantiate my facts and get to see you get all 'big man'. Good sport!

I'm quite a confident chap, slug, and if you were boring the pub with inaccurate facts about Thatcher, I'd gladly call you out. Don't worry, I've not forgotten your 'right hook'. I'm sure you are very scary... Yawn.

Just stop posting nonsense, admit you were wrong and move on. It's what actually big men do. And don't try to intimidate people on an anonymous message board - it makes you sound childish.

All irrelevant to the point you failed to make, sluggy. Swing and a miss - just tired right wing talking points. Stick to proving your one point about GDP under Thatcher - I'll wait.

And jezzoo, I'll take that. I've called out slug's stupidity but I haven't resorted to the kind of name calling he has. I'm just not as frustrated as him 😊

Great- I look forward to it. I look forward to you finding a quarter or month where the UK's GDP briefly bounced compared to other nations, and using it to defend the record of a prime minister who oversaw the UK's relative demise (in your chosen GDP standings measure) over 10 years (already proven here). How thick are you, slug? Even if you do find the anomaly you claim to recall, you will neatly illustrate my point better than I could! You're in a lose-lose and it's embarrassing to watch you flap around, too wrapped up in toxic masculinity to admit you chose the wrong data to illustrate your Maggie Fanboy Fantasy. Pop another steroid, abuse another race and console yourself that you're the big man....but you messed up here.

Https://web.archive.org/web/20130908231839/http://www.ers.usda.gov/datafiles/International_Macroeconomic_Data/Historical_Data_Files/HistoricalGDPSharesValues.xls

The second data set I posted was annual. And from the US government. Can you read, slug? Again, nice try to divert from your lies, but again it's failed. Stop clogging up this board, admit you lied and hoped you'd get away with it, and move on.