Member Info for Stackhigh

You made up that deadline though, Fort. "Early Q1" is meaningless, and indicative of the kind of wooly management speak that Scott favours. If it's late March he'll claim it's "Early: Q1 2024" instead. Truth is, if there was something cooking we wouldn't be down this low (I'm ready for your meaningless Noront comparisons). Market expects funding will be needed soon (it will), royalty deals less likely without a credible path to mining, and an issue to a big investor at this point would have to give away 20%+ of the company for $50m, my guess.

For all the fools believing the "we've never been in better shape" there are experienced investors recognizing this is now pretty precarious. Hope people haven't over- exposed themselves.

"runs on water"? I know you're thick, slug, but even you can't be expecting to have a stable oxide do work? Bond breaking was endothermic, last time I checked. Is this another Thatcher/temperature moment - you read a meme on your socials and didn't bother to do any research?

No doubt Toyota will need onboard electrolyzers if they're to flog any fuel cell cars, but I hate to break it to you: that's not "runs on water".

So slug's latest obsession is the self-confessed petrol head formed CEO of Toyota (who failed to secure comparable market share in the BEV sector under his stewardship - bit embarrassing and cause of further cries of nepotism) talking about 'peak-BEV'? Meanwhile UBS, RMI etc (who accurately predicted current market share and current plateau in sales) still think 60+% by 2030.

I wouldn't worry about the longevity of metal plays - the world is going to reduce it's reliance on dinosaur juice (and dinosaur points of view!) just fine without the hydrogen tech Toyota are over- exposed to in terms of R&D costs... Oh wait! Surely that couldn't be why Toyoda made his claim, could it?

Wrong again, sluggy. Ready to admit you're wrong about GDP under Thatcher yet, or just hoping we'll forget each time you make a fool of yourself?

I saw that ridiculous, unsubstantiated tweet about a Japanese company interest and assumed it was a joke. Why not say that the Portuguese want solg, or that there's likely interest from Luxembourg? These rampers get more desperate with every day their fiction fails them. Like add saying that WI was now an insider and thus couldn't speak positively about solg?!? Because it couldn't be that WI has just realized he was wrong, and were nowhere near a sale: Oh no.

Rampers gonna ramp

Here's the difference, add. I don't claim to better informed.

Unlike you lot, I don't pretend to hear voices from insiders, or try to extrapolate unrelated experiences of other stocks to this one. Instead, I understand exploration stocks and, what a surprise, it turns out I'm better at predicting the flight path of this stock than literally every b*****tter here. Amazing.

If you want to keep up the pretence that you're a good investor, be my guest.

I'll continue to be right and you'll continue to be wrong. Ultimately readers here can see who knows their stuff, and I've nothing further to prove 👍

Resigned implies a change of position to accept a new conclusion. I always knew this would talk a lot longer than the rampers claimed: I was saying so over a year ago.

Will the rampers accept this? Absolutely not. They will filter and repeat each other. Such is the echo chamber- they hate that more intelligent investors than them are correct more of the time. Red will make himself feel better posting links to 20 irrelevant articles about a copper deficit. Bbg will tweet WI for reassurance and then add will claim WI must have inside knowledge when he doesn't give them the answers they seek. Fort will make up things the company have said. Slug will be wrong about almost everything but the refuse to back down because his addolesc 'roid rage won't let him (Thather stats, anyone?! 😂)

Meanwhile it's good sport watching them pat each other on the back for finding articles about copper-producing mines or actual smelting firms. Check in a few times a week, call out the nonsense and watch them all get angry!

795k shares, bbg. I think that makes me a shareholder, even if it's not a big deal on this board.

What you (and others) fail to realize is that as an earning man (rather than a pensioner in need of an out before my wife realizes I've screwed the kids out of their inheritance) I can be patient with my investments. I can manage those that need it and leave others to sit. I can add a few 000 here and there, but not jizz at the thought of an imminent sale that isn't happening. I can add when dilution poses a threat, and profit a bit on upticks if I fancy a new toy.

I think those here who post daily about irrelevant spot prices, get excited about actual miners securing funding or refute all demonstrably bad news from LatAm are in a different boat from me. My boat is set to autopilot and might dock in 2025/26. If you can afford to ignore movement like me and others, I suggest you relax and take it as it comes. If you're leveraged up to the eyeballs or lying, as I suspect you are, keep tweeting Warren everyday. It gives him a break from crying about socialism in Canada.

Bbg appears to have caught the ellipsis rash from red. Say something with no plausible evidence whatsoever... Then throw in a trio of full stops... And hope they people 'join the dots'... Encourage people to think you know what's at play... it's ramping at its most deliciously amateurish.

No real surprise, his twitter reads like a toddler who has been allowed sugar for the first time.

Patience, all, please. Got a few years to run here yet. Rampers, take a day off. You've been ineffective over the last year and will continue to exert zero influence on the SP. Leave this board to the occasional bit of news that wouldn't be picked up by a news filter on 'copper price' or 'solgold' (anyways, it's red's job to post the results of a Google search of 'rampiest copper news irrelevant to an explorer'). That drops about once a week. Any other posting is bored pensioners longing for company, sadly.

It could be that, Hemo. Or he said it as a vague statement that can't be quantified (typical management speak). You know, because he is the guy who has presided over a collapse in the share price?

A cynic would say the director buys were fairly small, and came at a time when the SP desperately needed stabilising. What better way to try and project confidence than to buy a few shares? The SP has always risen on FOMO and it would benefit them if they generated some. What it actually did was remind the market that the talk of data room interest wasn't near to yielding anything interesting enough to block insiders from buying.

Add, which of your theories have been proven correct? And which have been wide of the mark? Do you keep a tally? A ratio of meaningful prediction vs. meaningless waffle?

I know it's not helpful to just pick holes in other people's nonsense, and I know I shouldn't bully the stupid, but I've just scrolled back over the last 24hrs.

"I guess we’ll find out tomorrow if the current upward trend continues"

What vacuous nonsense is this? Basically saying "tomorrow, we'll find out tomorrow's share price".

Codswallop

I don't think the aggressive taunting from massive is healthy, but it is clear that your childish, repetitive and unintelligent posts are not well received here. If you really like posting them (bit odd) you're correct that I can't stop you. But please, read the room, leave with whatever dignity you still have. 21 people and counting in the last hour keen to see you go. Not much to be gained from posting 'onwards and upwards' to a room full of people bored by you, but whatever. Your choice.

And whilst we skewer the pious, would someone please tell Red that this board will be better the day he stops trying (and failing) to ramp? 27 ellipses does not a convincing analysis of the company make...

Part of that was true, add- well done. You were wrong, that's true. But I only said there wouldn't be a sale in 2023... So I was right. I'm not wanting an apology from you or anything, but it's important we get our facts straight: I was right, you were wrong. All okay?

It will shock you, add, but I suspect slug might have had several other identities before his latest?

Quite right, you hate all definitive statements (still chuckling at the irony that clearly passed you by when you said that). You didn't predict an imminent sale (you never say anything of meaning), you simply accused me of making baseless claims that there wouldn't be a sale. And remind me, was I correct?

Not sure why you're mentioning me, add. 1981 is a name used by slug.

I clearly hurt you last November, and have since proved you're FOS with your expectations of a quick sale, but don't go dragging me into other nonsense. Thanks.

You're not even a serious human though, Red.

Are all definitive statements futile? 🤦‍♀️🤣