Member Info for Stackhigh

Not understanding how averages work is all we need to know about you, slug. Can you, dispassionately, see the difference between your example and the data used to monitor climate change by actual, intelligent scientists? If you can't see the difference there really is no helping you- you're too far down the conspiracy nut job rabbit hole.

I see I was right about today's 'rally'. Did I sell out last week and get back in at a lower price today? No. Because I don't need the money, I own plenty of stock and I can wait here whilst other investments make money. Anyone claiming to predict short term trends in this stock is a liar or fantasist (and these boards have plenty of both). Longer term, I think we'll sell eventually and I'll be in when we do.

Are you in or out, slug? Did you see the current massive drop in sp happening and sell up your entire holding? Or did you short? When do you intend to get back in? Or are you trading for tiny gains around the margin (and you'll claim to have bought in at 6.8p, selling at 7.4p?)

Fancy thinking temperature doesn't measure anything, or being taken in by a prank as old the hills about an engine that runs on water...

My strategy is working fine thanks, slug. How is your 'desperately hope for mews' strategy going? Got any bites yet? We seem to be down at sub-10p levels soy guess is you are struggling?

Add, bob also said 'fast and smart'. I know you reject everything I say, but perhaps be mindful of where you hitch your wagon.

In other news, we're not in the early stages of corporate action, despite what the rampers will either say or imply. This SP has plenty further to fall.

"the market yet again losses confidence in the CEO's ability to forecast anything.."

Ship sailed. Horse bolted. Share price crashed. And to think, some here thought DC was bad for solgold.

Bbg says everything is fine. If you want to reassure yourself (!), read his back catalogue of claims. He's like a human crystal ball 🤣

Has someone come for his kneecaps? Does he owe a lot? He's gone into full fever mode today, and sounds as disingenuous as ever.

And, for good measure, he still doesn't understand A trades and can't be bothered to educate himself.

Carbon as an element isn't the issue slug - no one is worried there are too diamonds or pencils. It's the infrared absorption that carbon dioxide (a compound) causes that's the issue. A larger proportion of Earth's radiation that should be able to leave the atmosphere is, instead, absorbed and re-radiated, hence the average global temperature rises (which, thank goodness, are tracked using millions of comparable data points annually, rather than the slug method of two).

If you don't understand the difference between an element and a compound (most 11 year olds do - it's year 7 science) I'm not sure you're ready to challenge scientific consensus... Maybe stick in your lane (driving a car that, magically, runs on water)

That's not 'running on water', slug. An ice engine doesn't work without a healthy dose of Castrol but it doesn't 'run on lubricant'. Since the invention of the phrase 'runs on', the word that follows has always been the source of energy. 'runs on petrol', 'runs on chip fat', 'runs on battery'. So when you said 'runs on water' you were showing that you believed, until my intervention, that Toyota had invented an engine that runs on water 😂. And in line with the toxic masculinity that has causes you to lash out and talk about how big and scary you are each time you're embarrassed (so damn cute and predictable, btw 🥰) you can't admit you were duped so you've invented this ridiculous defense of 'i always knew it was battery or hydrogen powered', even though your original post was no doubt denigrating one of these two options. You can't have it both ways, pal (or either way in this case).

And that, slug, is checkmate again. Please don't hurt yourself little fella- I don't want that on my conscience.

You said a car 'runs on water'. Can you explain? Because if it uses electrolysis it's going to need a power source (because bond fission is endothermic). Or you've described a hydrogen-powered car, and if you think that's 'running on water' then I've got a bridge on rightmove...

Face it, slug - you're just not that bright. And your ill-researched conspiracy theories about COVID, the environment... They just serve to highlight how thick you really are. I know you'll default to 'you are just a sheep' but the reality is scientists and engineers ARE more clever than basement incels like you, and no amount of making up stats about Thatcher can change that. Now give it a rest and maybe get a bit of education. Actual knowledge can't hurt you, I promise ♥️

As I suspected - if you can't interpret simple trends in excess death data there was no hope of you following a metadata study in a reputable journal. Did you get your interpretation from the same place you got your Tesla water engine story? Because I think I've found your issue. I love how this new breed of 'awake but not woke!' simpletons all use exactly the same (erroneous) talking points. Birds of a feather, hey?

I wasn't worried about your finances poppet. I know you've got plenty of money for your 16 cars, 12 girlfriends and 19 bedroom house with a rocket launch pad 😂

Anyway, I thought the study showing yet another benefit of the vaccine roll out was interesting, but it's not for this board. Enjoy your smallpox 👍

I'm not entirely convinced you can read, slug, and I certainly think the reading age of the lancet is probably a bit above your station (which is either 'twat parkway' or 'simpleton central', I can never remember) but in case one of your parents can interpret for you, I'll post this here

https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00414-9

Just off to spend some Hemo profits. Not a cross ramp (you're probably too late) but there's a few weeks in the Maldives coming out of this baby 👌

Maybe go and have a handy over Thatcher to ease the pain of your loss. Just try not to think about what she did to our GDP...

Not going to go into the realms of conspiracy theories (leave that to thicko slug) but the timing of Scott's purchase smacked of an effort to induce fomo and arrest the decline. Obviously it failed, and nothing since to stop the drop so he has egg on his face.

Rampers will immediately claim it's evidence of an imminent sale, but don't forget that they said that 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years ago. Plenty of old messages on here to embarrass them with if needed - they're thick as f*** but they don't have any shame

Are you off, bbg?

If (when) it doesn't, red, will you finally stop ramping and FO?

Who was it that said 'here come the sixes'?

They were right, it would seem. Who offered to teach them how to use level 2 data? Presumably someone with no foresight whatsoever, who thought we wouldn't hit the 6s?

As I have warned every time rampers claim to have topped up to draw in gullible newbies and support the SP: this has further it to fall. Maybe not this week, but we need to be ready to see low 6s, maybe 5s.

I hate it when they try to 'decimate personally transportation'.

The hardman routine is back! Lovely stuff- classic slug (incel keyboard worrior?)

Thanks for giving me what I needed- a cast iron admission that you were taken in by an age old prank about water engines (because you're thick) and you lied about GDP under Thatcher (because you believed some rubbish on your socials and weren't smart enough to do 5 minutes research before posting it here for all to see).

Thanks again 🥰

Assuming you mean the rouge 's'? Good catch. Just checking- you've never made a spelling mistake? Lol. It's always autocorrect, right?

I know it hurts you that I'm more intelligent than you, slug, but some things are just undeniable. How's that Tesla engine that 'runs on water' coming? 🤣 Get back in the sea you numpty. Or, alternatively, prove you are more intelligent by backing up the Thatcher claim of yours I so easily debunked. Your choice- the floor is yours.

Ps: if you come back with anything other than a journal piece about an engine that 'runs on water' and data showing that Britain's GDP became the 3rd largest in the world under Thatcher (your thick claims), you've proven my point 👍

I'm just quoting you, bbg.

Don't get upset or play the victim. If you talk nonsense, expect that it will come back to bite you. Just as your £10k bet with quady was claptrap based on your own ineptitude, so too your current assertions are rubbish. We won't see 120p, we won't get a sale anytime soon, and we're not in great shape as a company. That's not deramping: it's a statement of fact.

So, did you ever pay quady? Why didn't your 15 month hard deadline come good, if you're an experienced investor?

"Quady I’ll bet you £10k that Solgold is acquired within 15 months.

I’m happy to use copperpot, ship or bnc as intermediary to oversee and manage payment."

September 2021 from the brainless ramper bbg.

Do we know what quady spent the money on? Because we know you're a man of your word and not a thick as f*** rampers, right? 🤣

You're confusing evidence with wishful thinking, bbg, as you have for years here. That's the biggest clue that your ramping is nothing more than brainless fluff. Look at the number of terribly inaccurate predictions you've made, vs my correct predictions. Why would anyone listen to the fool (you) over the one who predicted we still wouldn't have a sale by now?