Member Info for Stackhigh

Won't address me by name because he's not brave enough, but I'll bite.

Price was 6.78 when I said it had further to fall (thanks for the reminder). Then it went below 6p. Did you Early Learning Centre maths degree cover that, slug? 🤣 It fell, as I confidently predicted.

How's that water car research coming, slug? Learnt to read a website get, or still getting taken in by April fools?

Yep, waiting on their reply. Have you fabricated anything to lend credence to your unfathomable bs yet, or are you hoping to lose so badly in the carpark that you can't type anymore? (For clarity, I'm obviously joking. Whilst I'm sure you wouldn't turn up to a face-to-face, I'm also absolutely confident you haven't found a way to make a car run on water. An neither has Toyota. But you're so keen to never back down that you can't admit you were taken in by an April fool. Not expecting any movement on this, the Thatcher BS, the temperature brain fart or the misunderstanding of infrared absorption. Has your mummy had you tested for autism? Your fixed thinking and propensity to fall for obvious hoaxes are good indicators to the casual observer).

In English, Slug, please.

Fear not, Jez, there is a 0% likelihood of that RNS this year

Jeez, come on folks. Slug won't post a link to a car that runs on water because of one thing: thermodynamics.

He doesn't understand thermodynamics because he has the intellect of a flee, and gets all of his talking points from social media posters who exploit his kind. As I've said before, I would feel sorry for him but he's so hostile he refuses help and instead resorts to schoolboy threats of carpark vengeance.

Simple question for a supposed graduate, Slug: if breaking bonds is endothermic, and water is a stable oxide of hydrogen, who will mechanical work (driving) be done if the raw input is water? For a car to 'run on water ' you need the overall enthalpic/entropic change in energy to be negative. Have Toyota discovered a new form of more stable hydrogen/oxygen compound? Is it sufficiently greater in entropy than liquid water such that the change in Gibbs Free Energy for the conversion is negative and available to power a car? Or is thermodynamics a hoax, perpetuated by Bill Gates, like the vaccine and anthropologically induced climate change?

Please, you're thick as treacle and digging deeper with every poorly researched post.

On 17th Dec you said you'd find the data... Then you didn't. Because it doesn't exist.

If you Google 'engine that runs in water' you get lots of people feeling sorry for the simpletons who get taken in by April fools jokes... Like you!

You said you had a science degree. Then you showed you know nothing about science and were just being your usual pub bore 'know it all who knows nothing'. Then you said it was a maths degree. You're a weird one, sluggy.

Why did you try to claim it was a science degree then? We're you confused?

I've been right about dropping below 6p (made a nice buying opportunity if you were smart- got away a few grand 👍) and it not selling. I can keep teaching you, and will happily do so, the moment you admit you were wrong about all of those quotes below? Each of them is easy to educate yourself about, and if you have a degree you shouldn't struggle with the research necessary.

Start with the water engine, then admit the Thatcher bolox (17th Dec you said you would find data that week... We're more than 3 months in... You still hunting?!), then find out what temperature is a measure of, do a bit of reading around infrared absorption and you'll nearly be there...

Still no answers. No surprise.

You went to great lengths to talk about your science degree. Then, when it became apparent you don't understand how a null hypothesis is rejected, you decided it was a maths degree... But you couldn't name the institution it came from. So I said it probably came from the Early Learning Centre and then you got all mad and invited me to a carpark... Your standard MO! Want to tell me I wouldn't call you out in person? That's another of your favourites, even though I've assured you I'm happy to embarrass you anywhere... You're beautifully predictable, and easy to wind up, like most keyboard warrior incels of your type.

Oh yeah- my favourite. That time you fell for an April fool and told is Toyota were developing an engine that "runs in water"!🤣 My favourite, because despite electrolysis of water being endothermic, you tried to claim to have a science degree afterwards to get out of it!! Beautiful stuff

Wtf are you on, slug? I embarrassed you over yet another ridiculous claim you made, and you think it's MY pants round my ankles? I know you lack a grasp on reality, but this is whack even by your standards.

Got anything to say about that consensus methodology, or are you just going to resort to your usual tactics for when you're bested? "Temperature doesn't actually measure anything", "UK GDP became 3rd biggest in the world under Thatcher", "CO2 levels don't have a significant impact on global temperatures", "fewer than 97% of climate scientists believe anthropological emissions are causing change to the climate".... I'm sure I've forgotten just as many of your other brain farts, but I've succinctly disproved all of your nonsense to date..

Numbers don't lie- check the scoreboard 👍

'SC' has just said it will be months or years to get permits. So we'll have to sell shares or do a deal which dilutes our share of the resources in cascabel. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for solgold and the government trying to pull the wool over peoples' eyes and pretend something is imminent, but once again I'll be proven correct and we will still be waiting for this event that's been 'going on behind the scenes' and 'just around the corner' and 'in the next few very interesting weeks' long into 2025. Mark my words, just as you could have done last year, before 'SC' crashed the share price.

We will speak again after the fund raise. You who have been sold the 'non-dilutive' nonsense can club together all you like, it's not going to help you then. Poor Scott - he really thought he was smarter than DC and Nick, but he's going to be the scapegoat at AGM '24 (which I imagine isn't happening? Like AGM '23 wasn't happening? Want me to screenshot all those rampy posts?! 🫢🤣)

I think maybe "permits will take more time" is probably just accurate, bbg. What have BHP or Newmont said that makes you think they're in a rush? I've not read anything to that end. They have waited patiently (because we're nowhere near ready for sale and they are not a charity to help out the scuba divers here) and will just continue to do so.

Situation is exactly as it was called by intelligent posters when Maxit got involved. For all their bluster, they aren't the ones with the deep pockets so they will have to wait patiently like everyone else. "Fast and Smart" was just a line for simpletons to gobble up, and it has worked on most of you 👍

Sp that's another embarrassing defeat for slug.

The consensus is real, the methodology for measuring is sound and when given the opportunity to critique it, he resorts to nonsense.

6-0?

Nice try, but back to the issue you raised about climate consensus.

How would you improve the most recent methodology for measuring scientific consensus around climate change? Your claims are poorly reasoned (that's generous), but you have an opportunity to demonstrate some intelligence here. The floor is yours: we will wait.

How would you improve Mark Lynas's methodology from 2021, Slug?

We're listening 🤣

I see this is at least the 5th GB news talking point slug has been taken in by. When will he learn- his attention is the product they are selling, and he laps it up like kool aid in a cult. Poor cherub.

I bet he'll be begging for public money to fund the dumb AF 'inquiry' they're calling for, desperate to fan the flames of their conspiracy nonsense. Could put that money towards returning the NHS to a working model, but he's been fed nonsense about privatisation by the same people who see him and his type as a useful idiot- cannon food in their battle to try and get more of the public purse. The irony is he thinks he's a soldier for freedom and, when he is just a hood-winked tool who hasn't a brain for stats, despite at least three imaginary science degrees... 🤣

Keep arguing with yourself on here, sluggy- whilst your in your basement bedsit it keeps you out of the real world and stops you doing any real harm. But please don't get all mad again like the last few times- you've got mosque-shooter vibes and I wouldn't want anyone to have to listen to your brain fart during their last minutes on earth.

The floor is yours, just watch your blood pressure 🫣

Stfu slug you stupid twat

ONS data show all-cause deaths in England were higher among the unvaccinated than those who had received at least one dose, for every month in its April 2021 to May 2023 dataset

Done. Think that's the 5th time I've pulled your pants down. Want to dispute this like you did your fake Thatcher data? Don't bother to find evidence, just claim to 'recall' data to the contrary and, when you're backed into a corner, talk about your fighting ability and invite me to a carpark.

Tool.

Until next time... Bye all 👹

I understand perfectly well, slug - that's part of how I've been able to call the movement of this share and the future of the company better than most 👍

As for 6p being the bottom, we've shown today that we can dip below and will, sadly for lths, be spending more time there in the coming weeks and months. There is not significant enough resistance at 6 for the graduated selling that will crystallise in the short-to-mid. Noise Vs trend: surely even you understand that?