Member Info for Stackhigh

It's nice to see you coming round to the idea that it's bad to break the Geneva convention, add. Baby steps. Do I think this will be quickly forgotten about? It depends if the president can now take some steps to reassure the international community- time will tell. If he doubles down on an exceptionalist, 'rules don't apply' MO then he's toast. You're a good example of someone staging a climb down 👍

Got away my 9.8 short at 9.3ish, good for a few tokens. Sitting out today as it's a proper work day- 11 sites due to wrap in the next week and not a trustworthy snagger anywhere in the north.

DD is the issue here, add. The UN confirming that this is a violation of the Geneva convention simply cannot be a good thing for the president's chances of attracting investment. There is violence and corruption in lots of the countries where majors invest, but blatant disregard for 'inviolable' international law is a troubling precedent. Majors sign IPAs which are underpinned and upheld by an adherence to international law. They can cope with the occasional coup or assassination, bribery or extortion, because the ruling parties in other jurisdictions are smart enough to adhere to the relevant bits of these legal agreements. Ecuador has just clearly demonstrated that it won't.

Will this harm investment in the country? Only time will tell. It doesn't matter to us anyway, as the rampers' "imminent sale" isn't happening this year (yes, slug is wrong about that, too. Can't blame Apple's autocorrect for all his stupidity)

Are the UN the 'usual idiots', SM? I don't think anyone here has provided more condemnation of Naboa than them. They love the Geneva convention: does that make them idiots? Which bits do you dislike, SM?

Excellent news if foreign investors are undeterred by president's recent actions. I wonder when this commitment was inked?

Sales require buyers, Eloro - a lesson Scott and Bob have learnt this year. And news about a president with little regard for international law likely won't help confidence. Majors are used to investing in volatile regions, but knowing that the man co-signing agreements with you doesn't think he has to honour them might be troubling.

Think some of the ramper crowd tried to make a similar arguement about several other vacant positions last year, ftjny, but it turned out solg were just very slow to fill them. Occam's razor says it's the same story here 👍

Again, you're not helping yourself cash.

Do you admit you were wrong about slander? And tracking posters? Or are you doubling down? Or ignoring your error? It's fine to just admit you didn't know what you were talking about- no judgement here. But if you double down, literally everyone here will be able to see how stupid you've been. Take your choice...

Shame autocorrect can't pick up your factual errors hey, cash? Might have stopped you saying someone had committed slander when anyone with half a brain would know that wasn't true.

Oh well, can't fix stupid.

Who are you seeking to infantilize, mathers? Is cash a school child? If so, it might explain why he doesn't understand slander or web protocol, and why he seemingly can't keep up with a conversation. Good shout.

Sorry cash, son- good luck with your exams sport 👍

Called many things, add- I won't ask you to go back through my whole history because you have a life, I'm sure, but they're there. I told everyone we'd have an AGM '23 because there wouldn't be a sale (against a strong rampy narrative at the time). I told you we'd dip below 6p against an instance that we wouldn't, and even bought some shares at 5.9p to prove it. I said slug has brought at the wrong time just this week and sure enough the price dropped all day. I said bob wouldn't be able to get anything away fast and smart, and many many months later I'm right about that, too. I can go on?

Cash, only a total turnip would think that what's posted here would impact the SP. I could announce that there is a sale coming tomorrow and it wouldn't move the needle one jot. The sooner the rampers here realise that the better, right? Please, everyone, hold on to your shares. Don't crash the SP on my behalf!

Should I close my latest short, cash, or do you say this has further to fall, like I did a while ago?

You're not helping yourself here, cash... 🤣

You said something similar last time, add, but I've just kept being proven right... So there has been no fall, no pain. Are you not setting yourself up for embarrassment when, once again, I'm right? Or does it only work one way? 😁

Is that the sound donkeys make when the penny drops?

Do far, in just the last hour from you, we've had:

1)posters here can be traced (they can't)

2)'legal routes' can challenge statements between anonymous bb posters (they can't)

Want to make it 3 or are you retiring to come back with another alias which hasn't been so comprehensively trashed?

Clearly you do not understand 🤣

"decided to challenge following legal routes" 🤣

Nearly wet myself.

I'll walk you through this very simply. Was the statement made in a place that could be considered public? Was the statement defamatory and demonstrably untrue, and known to be untrue by the person making the statement? Was the subject of the statement clearly identifiable?

Unless your birth name is 'cash my giro' it's literally impossible to write anything libelous about you here. FFS, what a thick donkey you are.

I'm obviously not certain, add- that would be mad. It's a public stock. But there's a reason I've repeatedly called it right here. Rather than believe the hype, from SC or the rampers here, just stick to what's likely and what's happened elsewhere. Am established playbook, rather than expecting a random act of charity. I know you'll thank me for my advice but then ignore it because you think you know better, but I'll say it again - there's a reason I've called it right thus far.

Meanwhile, in solg news... The last time it dropped like it's currently doing from over 10p, at the start of the new year, it took less than 2 weeks to go below 8p. Repeat this week/next? Wouldn't rule it out.

There will be news, add, but the market knows that those with deep pockets are never charitable, so it ain't going to be truly non-dilutive (because shareholders are going to have to give something in return for the cash, duh) and it ain't going to be at a big premium. So there is every chance we'll be pegged down below 10p for the foreseeable, and people like eloro will end up being more correct in their cynicism than the rampers are in their brainless 'jam tomorrow ' narrative.