Member Info for Ssccss

Also maybe you should do some maths tuition because a few people selling really isn't going to increase my profit margin. It's a bit more complicated than that lol.

Now can we just agree to ignore each other, we are cluttering the board. Filter me.

OK so I see why you have taken such a dislike to me. You're wrong but you are allowed your viewpoint. Unfortunately for you it's a public forum and you can't control other people's behaviour because of your own biased view of it. Thank god.

To be fair though, Im not sure what it is I post that you object to... It's generally based on facts and often other people post similar. Although, some change their tune like the weather.

Trout, that's fine. I don't affect the sp. The sp is a reflection of the company. This myth about shorters/derampers is the biggest con on aim. People love to believe that they have made a great investment choice and the only reason they haven't made any money is because so and so other there won't stop typing their alternative opinion on a BB forum haha.

There are many posters here who trade this. I'd say the majority.

I don't bash to push the price down. The price always falls...

I air my grievances because I know SYN keep updated with shareholder thoughts via this board and I have a right to share my views on their inept marketing and communication. I am not the only one who holds these views. Roland walks right into these situations repeatedly... Look at the last time line debacle and then the approval. Please stop focusing on posters on this BB and focus on SYN. They need to listen to shareholders, so yes hopefully the investor meet will improve the situation. However, that will only happen if we hear about funding.

So do I, on that we can agree.

You are so rude. Do you know how arrogant you sound speaking about Gordon that way.

Please do tell me how you have made money on syn if not by selling at some point, seeing at the sp always returns to the floor??? I've been here 6 years, I didn't make any money for the first 3 so I changed my approach. It's not a crime to actually make money investing on AIM.

And actually I would be happy if the sp rises as I will make money but equally if it falls, I'll average down... So I'm not biased in any direction. I will adapt to what happens but what does annoy me is when aim companies keep investors in the dark or even worse, use smoke and mirror tactics.

I've just told you the truth. Believe it not. Doesn't matter to me. I was trying to help you see that other people may be invested here but actually want to hold the management to account and see some shareholder value. I really do not understand why you would invest, let the company do what they want as they want and on top of it never make a profit and just live in a never-ending cycle of disappointment... That's what most investors do on AIM. Spot the pattern and break out of it.

Also I think you are being very condescending towards Gordon. No one plays him. He has a critical mind and is very astute as he is aware being an engineer. The only time he comes across as naive is when he believes Rolands timelines. We are here to make money at the end of the day and that requires some thought!! Not just buying and then being optimistic no matter what happens.

Trout, I'm pretty sure I hold more shares than you at almost 60m.

Gordon, I'd love to see your questions if you are happy to post them. Don't worry if not.

I agree it seems ridiculous to want to remove him but I don't think the sp would plummet and the company would crumble.

So investor meeting... Wonder what will be said about the funding situation. They must know that will be in the forefront of most investors minds.

Perhaps hemoknowledge would care to offer their opinion on how the clinical trials might be funded because it's getting slightly desperate now.

No one said there was to be a placing in the morning. You are funny. You also tend to change your tune as it suits you. Let's see what your next narrative is regarding how hemo are going to pay for the clinical trials because the "Stu has promised non-dilutive funding" has been a cracker.

Well the pump didn't exactly work so...

So much anger. Wonder why.