RE: Barracuda CPR18 Jan 2022 17:53
very entertaining posts today, thanks all.
so with regard to barracuda and the cpr, ginksy argues that the cpr has not
been progressed because it would not be prudent for ADME to spend money
on something which they might lose (- or be told they never really owned it!)
BUT ginksy and other rampers have also previously tried to argue that ADME had
not previously informed the market about the barracuda dispute because it was
trivial, with zero merit, not risky for ADME, & the sort of thing that happens all the
time to companies operating in nigeria, & hence it would be excessive to RNS it.
lol, doesn’t really square, does it?
if the dispute is serious enough to justify deliberately building in a delay
of more than 6 months to CPR, and hence to other aspects of exploiting
barracuda, that doesn’t really make sense if the dispute is so mundane &
utterly without merit that ADME didn’t think it needed to tell the market.
(particularly as ADME had RNS’d when the announced the CPR that
it would take 4-6 weeks, and they would keep the market updated.)