Member Info for Spikeyj

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bps-green-man-bernard-looney-drowns-in-black-gold-gxgn6pfkf?shareToken=bc73e281d7f71a46eebac8f01fbfdb6e

it has all been b/s for a long time (probably since the
very beginning) - there is no evidence that they *ever*
had any meaningful product or service to sell. aimho.

maybe somewhere in 3rd or 4th week of september the group of pis
who are being milked will get a phone call from santa amit to let
them know that their money is ready, but to collect it they just need
to pay some kind of ‘transfer fee’ or legal fee to get it sent to them…

… just “one more” cash-call to finally get it “over the line”? - lol!

(me, i think my 20th july post is more plausible scenario.)

hubba, do you still believe what you posted back on 30th june at
15:48, that no-one has put any more money into ctag for 4 years?

nice day.

sold a few more,
now half remain.

antha, in fairness to amit, they are not exactly using cutting edge
technology at ctag … it can take a while to migrate data from the
ZX80 onto CTAG’s newer ZX81 server, using C60 audiotapes to transfer.
)(next year I gather they are hoping to upgrade to a mini-disk format.)

switched a few PHNX into small AZN add.

sold a few.

no big surprises. market is shrugging,
but results ok by me. happy l/t long.

… grand old duke of york …

? AIM’s most substandard ever pump & dump underway?

20 trades today, for a total of about £9,500 … lol!

and almost £4,500 of that just comes from two pairs of trades which
cancel each other out, i.e. two trades at 13:47 when someone bought
250,000 shares total, and then two trades at 16:19 when those 250,000
shares were sold again. seriously, is anyone really going to fall for this??

[lol, still, this is AIM, so maybe they will find some very, very gullible
new punters to fund the placing and pay for those outstanding pay
and perks for the BoD - stranger things have happened on AIM!]

lol, don’t tempt fate. mr g, it’s usually when someone
says something similar that AZN drops a thousand pips.

hi frobert.

you’ve been around this board for a few years, so you already know that
those kind of questions have been asked before, & i’ve answered before.

but hey ho, one more time, yawn, no, i am not richie jennings, winnifrith,
nor do I have any connection with those folks, align / sharepuppets etc.
i read and post here as i find this an interesting & entertaining share,
& it sometimes has some quite interesting lessons one can learn from.

this is a chat board for discussing ADME company & its shares, so it’s a bit
of a shame from my point of view that you don’t want to post what your
reasons are for claiming to be positive about ADME’s prospects. i’m happy to
post my own views about ADME, including my reasons for being v sceptical
about ADME and its BoD, but it would make for a more interesting discussion
imv if supposed bulls such as you were willing to explain what you believe are
the plus points here …but since frobert seems reluctant to argue the bullish
case for ADME, would anyone else care to say why they think ADME is a buy?

on a slightly different, but ADME related note, i’d also be interested if
anyone could clarify which would rank higher in the event of ADME
going into administration or being liquidated: (a) the project level
debt, or (b) deferred pay and perks owing to BoD members but not
yet paid our? … i am wondering about this because ADME clearly has
no cash left, & i guess is just limping along with the BoD trying to
wait until the next placing to claim their pay and perks. but even if
they cannot get another placing away to refill the swine trough,
monies owned to creditors such as BoD members for back-pay would
obviously rank way ahead of the poor old ordinary shareholders.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/oil-stocks-have-dropped-but-theyll-gush-profit-again-tx9dk576l?shareToken=ba4d5d62911c50a32416216d1e1d76ab

softly softly

i wonder why someone like frobert would prefer to take
a conversation “out of this forum” rather than post any
evidence or reasoning to support their purported
optimistic view of this share’s prospects? - odd, that.

usually on these chat boards if people actually have any
proper evidence or analysis to support their positive view
they are only too happy to post it….i suspect the problem
with ADME is simply that there is actually b***** all that
can be said positively about a company like this, but
the would-be rampers just don’t want to admit that.

“I’m only supposed to be monitoring…”

? on whose behalf?

hi frobert,

no of course i’m not invested in ADME — i’ve been consistently
sceptical about its leadership, ‘assets’ and prospects for a long
time (throughout which it has steadily destroyed s/holder value)
so you’d hardly expect me to own any shares in it, would you?

& no, i don’t want to “take this conversation out of this forum”. i am a bit
puzzled why you suggest that. LSE is a public share discussion forum, & i
post here as i am happy to discuss share pros & cons in the public domain.

meanwhile you still haven’t answered what evidence you have
for your assertion that you: “… believe the management are
on the right path for future growth and shareholder return.”

? what do you base that on?

… looking at your 19/7 11:05 post, your argument so far seems to be that
(a) some other companies have gone bust but ADME hasn’t gone bust yet,
& (b) positive thinking might help people obtain their exit price. - is that it?!

antha, i agree with you on some aspects, but i don’t actually believe
that amit is seriously worried about any legal action at this point.

shurely, far too late for that? … i suspect the game is that he continues
to extract more money from a small group of retail investors who are
placated & groomed through private channels. just my personal suspicion.