RE: re- idiots6 Aug 2019 16:20
Sheps, I agree, the deal WILL now happen, I think we all know that. The only element I see some PIs still looking at is the element of risk on the terms of the deal.
The deal is clearly done, given the bidder is paying $500k to progress drilling whilst tying up loose ends, so their is a clear lack of want and urgency to drill next year.
Lets not get confused with the reasoning for exclusivity. This was for drilling costs (not, as in the case of BPC for example, purely to keep other parties away).
I would imagine both the JV partners and the bidder are aware of the need to get things moving for drilling, and they would no doubt have wanted the full FO deal done before this.
However, for whatever reason it didn't happen, so it is likely the bidder wanted some security for his $500k, hence the exclusivity, AND the wording if the JV doesn't perform (by act or omission). Its simply protecting the bidder from 88E taking the money and running (not that they would of course), but this is how large legal teams operate - risk management
Remember, its not IF the deal is done, its the TERMS of the deal that is still a risk to some investors, and I can understand that, given the terrible market conditions at present, even more so on AIM and Oil companies.