RE: Shares31 Oct 2018 19:35
Yes, that's a pretty good summary of it, Mr.Investment.
So, on the surface, all the hopes for this company were on the Halcyon contracts coming through. Taking away the LED side of the business doesn't affect that, because that was never the side that was leading people to invest here for long term.
But: ... It may be that putting the LEDs into administration gives new urgency for fund-raising. I don't know enough about the assets and debts in the LED side of things, but one would expect there was some debt that wasn't going to be called in immediately. So they wouldn't have spent all the working capital in the group paying off the debt as fast as possible - they'd have left some cash to keep the business running. And, again, depending on how much they are free to move assets between the two companies, that could have given the group as a whole some cash to keep things ticking over while they pursue those contracts.
Now, however, any cash left in the LED side of things will need to go to pay debtors with immediate effect. That means that although they'll have cleared the debts from the balance sheet speedily, they've used up their cash at bank and in hand much faster than they had planned to, ... which means raising funds now has to be done more quickly to stay afloat. So, indirectly, the administration of the LED business does affect the viability of the IOT business.
Possibly. Probably. Maybe.
Others?