RE: rm2investor29 Sep 2017 15:15
Surely a 50% dilution which gives the company a life line to stay in business and grow is better than loosing your full investment and potentially we would still be a company with no debt and a growing revenue stream.
I also think that Molson, Verlinvest and Woodford would not have thrown an additional US$20m at the company back in June if they did not think it would survive. Some say they had no choice but yes they did, they could have walked away, taken the hit saved themselves the US$20m
However, we still have a chicken and egg situation, we need contracts for the finance and finance will not come without contracts.
If they do manage to pull it off I could see a nice tick up in the SP