Member Info for Skwizz

Lolololol.
Do you even know what irony means?
======
JHemmings
Today 11:22
No personal abuse.
======

"JHemmings
Today 11:41
I find it very boring trying to talk about oil and gas to activists on here.
They can't seem to do it.
I'm bored with their silly kindergarten posts.
See you genuine investors if there any left on her over on twitter."

Well that didn't age well!

Maybe his friends & family were all busy.
Wonder why that might be...
:'D

Also to those producers who lost thatose profits during lockdown (which nobody mentions) who can invest in the North Sea, buying products and creating jobs.
:)

Yep.
It should go directly to investors so we have more money in our pockets to spend and bring the country out of recession.
;D

*deliberately ignore.

HNY and GL everyone.

=======
ells_valexpert
Today (24Oct22) 12:06
Posts: 1,060
Price: 0.0705
Strong Buy
Over .20 by year end.
=======
ells_valexpert
Posted in: UKOG 14Dec2022 09:48
Posts: 2,062
Price: 0.061
No Opinion
RE: Barcharts 100% sell
I may be wrong, everyone gets trades wrong from time to time.
=======

I believe Ibug's already given you the answer to that a week ago.

Even worse than that.
It's down 99.9% since the heady 11.2p days when 'he' started, five odd years ago.
And just look at where it was in 2005 (different company back then though).

======
ells_valexpert
Today (24Oct22) 12:06
Posts: 1,060
Price: 0.0705
Strong Buy
Over .20 by year end.
======

Poor Malvolio.
You'd have better luck suggesting the sun will rise tomorrow.

D'uh!
Now he's trying to convince us that filtering removes thread titles as well.
Lololol.

Agreed.
I'm only suggesting filtering those who have no real opinion or interest here and only make inane posts to get a reaction by abusing other posters and cause a distraction.
:)

Exxon's not related to UKOG but it's possible their action might bring some impact to bear on UKOG in the future.

htt ps:/ /ww w.bbc.co.uk/news/business-64113398

"US energy giant ExxonMobil is suing the EU in a bid to force the bloc to scrap its new windfall tax on oil firms.
A windfall tax is imposed on firms that benefitted from something they were not responsible for.
Energy firms are getting much more money for their oil and gas, partly due to supply concerns as a result of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
But Exxon accuses Brussels of exceeding its legal authority, calling the measure "counter-productive".
ExxonMobil reported a quarterly profit of almost $20 billion (£17.3 billion) in October."

I (naturally) do not oppose personal wealth.
But when Corbyn was opposing Boris as the representative-of-the-common-working-man and moaning about wealthy Tories, his personal wealth exceeded £3,000,000.
His former-banker wife's wealth exceeded $500,000,000.
Funny dat.

Or pure Sandercon effluent...

Showing your illiteracy there, dumb.

.....For example.
;)

For posters who have nothing whatsoever to contribute and post only for a reaction.
The free "Filters" facility appears above the blue "Post Message" button.
Copy the relevant poster's name, click the "Filters" button and paste in the appropriate box.
Then click "Filter Chat".
This is all provided free by LSE Admin..
A bit less fun but makes scrolling the board a lot quicker and easier.
;)

Awww dumman got vetted.
Ah well, it amused me anyway.
:D

"YOU TALKING NONENSE"

Oh, the ecstatic irony.

:'D

When I thought this had a chance of a turn-around (a few years ago now), I used to "average down".
After I woke up I realised this was actually just throwing good money after bad.
Averaging only works if the price goes back up at some point.
You'll notice that the only people still averaging, or talking about averaging, are the same people trying to ramp this up.
If wishes were fact, they'd be rich already.
Unfortunately neither is true.
I hope they will see the light or a turnaround one day.
Personally I don't care which as either will work just as well for me, and for them.