Member Info for Skwizz

Thank you for showing an interest in my interesting and humorous posts.

:'D (

Awww it deleted the bit where I laughed at my own joke.

:'D

"The poster who has never contributed a single post about anything remotely intresting. I bet you laugh at your own jokes. I hope so as nobody else does. As your not smart and you not funny."

So much irony, so little IQ.

Lololol (

All of the economies of those countries who have scrapped their equivalent of our inheritance tax have seen huge benefits since.

If any Chancellor were ever to seriously try to improve the economy, that would be their first step.

Until then it's just more waffle-spin with the same educational value as Adrian's best weekly output.

Don't know any realist who doesn't think this can work as a trader.

Just not a LTH.

Except those super investors; Tricky and TH2, obvs.

"UKOG has not made a public announcement to shareholders about the production suspension."

D'uh. That'd be the day.

You should have glanced through the forum.

This has been ongoing for years and judgement was given back in June '24 finding in favour of the habitual, green, court-botherer, Finch.

No need to wait and see, maiditup.

The answer is obviously and already, 'no'.

Don't let me stop your imagination from running amok though.

Entertaining as it is.

:D

LSE Admins are wise to all the nonsense of some regular "posters".

Simply draw it to their attention (they can't be everywhere) and they can, and will, usually render a very swift judgement.

Personally I use two strategies.

Trading UKOG the volatility lead me to take quick profits (a bird in the hand).

But at the height (six to seven years ago) you could do that two or three times some days and bank 10-20% each time.

The first time I did it it rose 300% and that was too much for me (at that time).

That was my first ever "trade" and what lead me to wondering if it was a viable strategy.

I now trade some other shares (I still trade BP a lot, but I also sit on a lot more and just take the dividends).

They're aren't as volatile so I have to wait days weeks or months for some to turn a profit.

I started as an LTH for everything and, even now, I hold much more of my total portfolio than I trade .

Probably more than I did a year ago.

Even though trading did work for me, the amounts grew to a size I wasn't happy "playing around with".

So I set myself a limit of £10k per trade (other than when I started with UKOG, I have gone over this three times in seven years, when I traded all of my BP holding in single movements).

Only once has this not worked out for me; I saw a share falling unusually quickly.

I'd been watching it for a while and thought something else was going on.

I threw £30k at it and the share went bust within about two hours.

I'd built it up to £30k so I didn't really lose that much and I also got compensated.

But it was still £30k that was in my account at one point and wasn't two hours later.

C'est la vie (he said nonchalantly, while still silently fuming...!)

What do you get when you surround yourself only with people who say what you want to hear?

"The Emperor's New Clothes".

I've said it before and no doubt I'll say it again.

Not investors, madeitup.

Just you schoolkids.

And your maths hasn't improved has it?

If you take the information in my post, it would result in a period of five years.

Even if you knew the full detail, it would still only make nine years!

And that was before I ever heard of UKOG.

Bad at English, bad at Maths, bad at investing.

Not too much going for you really, is there?

Lololol

:'D

Sharebel, it's only you rampers don't seem to understand this and posts that non-holders should not visit this forum.

Just one of many things you all don't get.

Which may explain why you still believe your LTH shares will eventually return a profit rather than ultimately see your wager disappear completely.

Most of the profits I made from UKOG came before I'd even found this forum.

I started out (very briefly) with the intention of being a long-term holder and with a positive attitude toward the business potential.

I held many more shares and funds than I do now.

I still hold a lot of those and a few others; I have not held UKOG for over a year (maybe even two), other than a small dipping of my toe back into the waters after the recent significant rise (which I completely missed).

But when I found this forum I was only interested in finding out more about UKOG, eighteen months after I'd made my first investment in it.

By then we'd had the first dilutions (which I'd used to flip the shares during the period of most volatilty).

I'd gone from thinking this might fly to having seen it fly and then knowing it would fall.

Which it did but I was still able to trade the volatility on the way down because it was so extreme.

I have posted on other shares' forums maybe once or twice, but certainly have not spent as much time on those as I have here.

Nothing like I used to on here though because I wasn't dealing with those the same as I was with UKOG.

I'd still be interested in UKOG now, if I felt there might be 1) a potential upswing, or 2) the kind of volatility I felt comfortable with trading again.

So I visit the forum, but don't post as much as I used to.

When I do post it's only to poke fun at the educationally bankrupt.

I think they believe that if they post what they want to happen to UKOG it actually will.

Or they're just morons.

Saturday, Alan?

Surely you'll be wanting Friday's numbers(?).

:D

'The Emperor's New Clothes' springs to mind.

Good ole TrollPusher1.

Oh and 'hi' again Adrian.

:D

Thought for a minute they were starting to pave the way to oust Scammerson.

No, no, I read here every day from one of the nutters how there's big news coming tomorrow.

They post it every day but the day there is news they'll claim they were right.

They're very Trumpian about most things including facts.

To be considered a 'basher' by the morons who think I am.

I'm also opening up a specialised pet-eating restaurant in Springfield as my new retirement hobby.

When you are persistently positive on a stock, it takes you time to realise you've got it wrong and the stock has been falling for the seven years you've been trying to convince others that it hasn't.

Seven years listening to fools and holding on will have cost you dear.