Stefan Bernstein explains how the EU/Greenland critical raw materials partnership benefits GreenRoc. Watch the full video here.
DFS is required for offtakers. DFS is required for financing and DFS is required for CEZ to commit to decision to mine.
Facts are facts regardless of the location of my trousers. That's not a sentence I thought I'd ever need to explain to someone HAHAHAHAHAH
Probably the best decision you've made. With all that extra time on your hands and less stress in your mind you'll hopefully be able to think straight and see how detrimental KC's words are to the share price.
Have a listen to that interview again. Focus on the point where KC says the DFS has no influence of the timing of the project. Then listen to how he describes the importance of the projects timing with regards to everything that comes off the back of having a DFS
I answer your question with the same response because the answer is always the same.
KC tells (repeat repeat repeat, ramp ramp ramp) his shareholders what he's going to do. Then when the time comes to show us the results, he repeats repeats repeats the same old excuses and then tells (repeats repeats repeats, ramp ramp ramp) his shareholders what he's going to do. Each time he as did that over the last 8 years, the value of his word has droppped droppped dropped and now it's at the point where for most potential and historical investors that word has ZERO value. I challenge you to find me evidence to the contrary.
It's OK gruntmachine, it took me several years of hearing the same thing over and over again before I realised the truth. You'll get it at some point too.
So, from a critical thinking point of view, which is not the same as being a basher, I see nothing of value from that interview.
I see no distinction in this interview from any of the previous 20 odd interviews I've seen of this man.
There are promises of things happening and promises of near term announcements. All previous interviews did the same thing with no results....
It contains mostly bla bla bla about the macro economics of the Lithium industry and no real substance or detail about what he's been doing with EMH.
And it somehow tries to put a spin on the fact his DFS from before Christmas was so poor that they've had to delay it's release TWICE to revise it's numbers.
What's the saying? fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me
OMG. WiseOwl is hilarious.
He thinks the drop in the share price from before Christmas is because of me and nothing to do with the EMH management of the asset and their communication with shareholders.
You've done nothing there but indicate your words are as meaningless as KCs.
Maybe you are KC?????
For those still in touch with reality.
I just want to clarify that I am not a deramper.
I am measly pointing out the historical facts associated with how the management of EMH have dealt with this deposit and how their behaviour is consistent and predictable. If you read through my posts over the last 4 months you'll even see how those predictions once again became a reality.
It's those patterns that now drive the price of EMH and no amount of Macro economics will chamge it.
The price will fall until their are results. It's really that simple now.
I think your timing is a little off. Its gonna continue to drop until EMH can show they are capable of progressing the project. Doesn't matter what the macros say anymore.
What matters is the truth and its impossible to know what that is. RNS' timelines clearly have no value here. To add value to the company they need to first add value to their words.
Maybe I am a riddler, maybe I'm not.
But with regards to what I've explained would happen since the DFS changed from early Q4 to mid Q4 and all statements after that turned out to be exactly what happen and the sp is only 2.5p away from the single digits I mentioned mo the ago. So why don't you backtrack to the discussions we've had over the last few months and analyse where you were completely wrong. Then tell everyone in detail all the kistakes you made.
Oh sorry greenmachine. I didn't realise that KC wasn't part of EMH and that both the representatives of EMH and CEZ weren't in anyway related to geomet. So is geomet just some other random company that's in the office next door? I'm so confused now. I was underthe impression all this time that EMH and CEZ were the two shareholding owners of geomet who are hoping to mine Cinovec.
This has totally changed my outlook. I think I'm going to invest all my money in EMH now.
How do we even know its related to geomet pulling strings? There's been so many claims and excuses it's impossible to distinguish reality with this company anymore. I imagine if you watched the last 20 interviews with KC every single one would have lies in it. Can you remember the last time he said something was going to happen and it actually did?
I did answer.
I said it's because its not an isolated incident. How many times has KC told us the same thing? There are a lot more incidents where he's told us something will happen where it didn't and CEZ were not pulling the strings.
A different CEO would easily learn from his behaviour and not repeatedly make false claims or claims about things he was not in control of. I don't remember the RNS saying delay to Q1 provided geomet agree to xyz
Its because of the number of times and period over which he told us there would have a DFS, offtakes, licences, EIS' that have never appeared. People invest in EMH (not geomet) on what the CEO of that company tell everyone what is going to happen.
This is not an isolated incident. If it was, it wouldn't be a big deal.
Wise owl. You need to zoom out of the financial fundamental of the lithium market and acknowledge the fundamentals of the people in charge of this company.
The fundamentals of the management are the only thing that will drive the share price of this company. There will be no more spikes to £1 on speculation anymore. Cold hard facts, real progress and results are the only reason any sensible person will buy into here. It's been endless lies for years. Wake up dude