RE: All about Barrick.20 Oct 2017 07:46
Furthermore, if there was a fraud then Barrick benefited to the tune of 63%. Why should Acacia shareholders foot the entire bill? Barrick should pay 63% of the 300 million and compensate Acasia shareholders 63% for the loss of assets. I don't own any Barrick gold shares so why should I sacrifice everything. WHAT IS BARRICK GOLD GOING TO PAY FOR? This is ridiculous and it stinks. That's why the share price tanked late yesterday. Acacia is nothing but the slave in that deal.