Quady, we don't have either. The situation at the moment is that the drafting of the PFS concluded the project isn't feasable as planned. PLEASE taks a few days off
Looking at this in a slightly more tempered light than earlier today, this rns has replaced the PFS as, having compiled the PFS, they have decided the project was not feasible as previously planned.
What an utter ballsup! I can only offer my most sincere apologies for suggesting anyone should back Mather at the AGM. I am also paying very heavily for my misguided trust. I'm sorry.