RE: Overlooked7 Aug 2022 19:28
CHRI5P I think the market is pricing us on the history of 'drills - assays - JORC - mets - placing - drills - assays - JORC -mets - placing'. The big question is are we now in a position in which Myles can break that pattern? IMO if shareholders interests are uppermost in his mind, as they should be, he simply has to. I say that because any LTH who doesn't want to buy more stock, or can't afford to will be stuffed by a placing discounted below these levels. If an equitable partnership deal can't be hatched then LTH's might well be better served by a low ball complete asset sale. However there are multiple reasons that make me very hopeful that some kind of JV should be an attractive proposition for us and another party. Top of my wish list is a dual mining and renewable energy project. Lundin seem an obvious possibility despite protestations from LR & MC, it is unclear IMO if back in rights expired or remain with the royalties, plus they have set up a green energy company (Orrön) based in Scandinavia but with a declared strategy of expansion in Europe. In a way if something is on the table and it's a big 'if' I hope it isn't Lundin, not just because they may have leverage with the retained rights but they may take the view that as we've grown the asset so have their potential royalties without them lifting a finger. All guesswork but a bit of fun while we wait for our fate which reminds me of one of my favourite Youtube clips which might neatly summarise our predicament: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGU5A0nPHsI