We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Ignoring all the sad in-fighting which has ruined an interesting discussion point....
I am LT holder and sufferer (average 20p) and my only hope is peace talks / sanctions slowly lifting / chances of sale increasing. If Zelensky really is biting the bullet and discussing how to start talks this is a postive sign for EUA, if not for the poor Ukranian people, and LT peace in Europe. The chances of getting my money back greatly increase if the orange buffoon gets POTUS again.
Any land gains by Putin will be a travesty of course and only encourage him to try again.
Trying to say positive, didnt VB have options to buy at 80p? Seems a long way off that!!
Surely its good practice to release an RNS when a share price rises or falls on zero factual news and its just a pump or dump?
Next RNS was certainly impactful
Yes it is very frustrating, would much rather some cpaital gain than a big dividend right now.
Not sure of the reasoning, other than being shafted by the BOD via equity raise when they said they would use debt
A very accurate summary of AIM and the LSE board, thanks Chid
Should be a sticky thread at the top of every share chatroom !!
closing of shorts?
Yeah great news
Agree not sure why people are opposed.
It shouldn’t devalue anything, share price does up and number of shares goes down pro rata. Investors should end up with same total value, and the company looks a bit more credible with a higher SP. Less easy to move SP with silly value trades.
Not sure what I am missing here.
Yeah, decent update with hopefully sone good news in next 2 months before FS in Q4. He is not very exciting to listen to but at least seems calm and assured
"Diluting shares by nearly 20 percent will that mean 80p is on the cards or is this all priced in?"
Er no, not if you use the money raised to buy an asset of equivalent or higher value. The company has a higher asset value which is now divided by more shares, so SP should in theory be stable.
Do institutional investors belive this paid-for PR fluff? Their price target is 40p which would be great if they were independent and did their own research rather than regurgitating the ZNWD presentations.
Also I took a look at their "research" and their predicted P&L 2023 to 2025 had zero expenses. Are the board not getting paid, and the ofices i nHigh Wycomber and Germnay provided for free?
It is not at all mysterious in this regard.
Your transaction is not a buy - it is a buy AND a sell, you need both for a trade.
The buy or sell flag is so irrelevant brokers don't even report it.
The flag is auto-populated by the exchange depending on where price was vs the mid at time of trade.
Only the price is singinificant.
Amazing how many on here fixate on the flag and complain their buy was wrongly reported.
If you bought someone sold, it’s what makes a trade
Why? Do you know the exact mid at time of trade and thus how the trade is marked?
every trade is a buy and a sell - do you understand how they are marked?
maybe he wants to buy more
that would seem to be a no
no more so than rampers like Simms45 I would think?
How do you know "sale of Deeside was turned down, presumably because the offer wasn't good enough" rather than for example, buyer getting cold feet because it wasn't good value or thought build cost was understimated. None of us knows.
PB putting a positive spin that other bigger buyers are keen is more "market manipulation" than some on here
Thanks for the link.
Looks like lots of good news to come in Q4 (slide 22)