Member Info for Scrodingerscat

Tried day trading years ago for a year or so, wasn't worth the stress for small gains. You make more by having a balanced portfolio and just kicking back and watching and exiting when the dynamics change. Some stocks I have held for so long that even if they collapsed to zero they've already paid me 15 times over what I paid for them in dividends. Though a crash comes every once in a while so the regular PI can hedge better than compared to the last few crashes. People don't look at the stock market long term enough the power of compounding really does create wealth, compared to in and out every day.

You couldn't let it lie could you OTM what you fail to mention is that your own posts were also removed, tit for tat and I'm not condoning others responses but you had your part because you more than once used someone's origin as a derision. I don't need to spell it out but using someone's nationality to criticise or demean, fully exposed your prejudices. You've gone down I'm sure in many people's estimations (pretty low already) that read your posts yesterday. One word... Weasel.

Rookie1 it's only his other personalities that ask him anything. Everybody else knows that you're better off asking the family dog's opinion for a better formulated evidenced based opinion.

The thing is with these kind of views it's ok for people to doubt. Nobody has an issue with that, but it's the completely unrelated links to an imminent placing. Obviously anything is possible until it isn't but the simplest answer is often the right one. It makes no sense to bring in a director to sell shares at a massive discount, none whatsoever. There are firms that do just that, market and run capital raises. If Tim wanted to, because they need cash he'd just tap Lanstead again. They'd be more than willing considering how much they've made here over the years. A placing seems to be the strawman argument here that lets be honest if it was going to happen would have happened a few days after it was hitting year highs. To be clear there is nothing in that appointment at all that suggests imminent placing or no deals are in the offing that is 2 plus 2 equals fish territory. Only time will reveal these opinions for what they are... Unfortunately.

Rookie1 the pure fantasy posted by some on here would put Tolkien to shame. I posted prior to patent news they needed a deal maker, a few posters lambasted me for the suggestion (even touted the independent as the guy, but I won't relitigate that). Though if they do indeed have talks going on in the background, it makes perfect sense to bring someone in with that kind of expertise or contacts to bring in more interest. Even if he was paid double that and he is able to bring a better deal to the table then who cares what he's paid. If this guy helps secure a good deal then it's money well spent, if not and brings no value he can get his p45 along with TM. I think the market is just pricing in this news as a deal not being imminent, but clearly the company is trying to get the best deal not the quickest deal. Which should be seen as a positive for all those wanting to achieve maximum value for their shares.

Roger65 nothing like a good story getting in the way of facts. For anyone not equipped enough to sort fact from fiction institutional investors can take positions on the open market and this is a regular occurrence if you look across FTSE and AIM you will see releases of just that happening. They do not have to be handed shares cheaply and usually there is some quid pro quo arrangement ie the issuer gets something for selling the shares cheaper than market value. In terms of market caps limiting some investors that is true, but there are plenty of specialist funds that invest in small caps or new pharma specifically. I don't know why everyone is banging on about £100M, as indexes that actually buy volume will buy when or if the market cap is high enough for IMM to join the AIM-100 which is approximately £120M. II's can be a blessing and a curse, they are in most cases sticky holders but when you only have one or two and they want to exit share prices dive I remember getting into XPS pensions for under a quid because one of their II's dumped all there shares crashing the shareprice for no reason.

I've stopped responding to him if everyone does the same then he's just talking to himself. He lives in his own universe and makes stuff up without any basis of fundamental truth. I mean we know they will run out of cash at some point in 2026 TM has said as much the Lanstead deal ends in November but if all the warrants are exercised that's additional runway possibly into 2027. So there is no panic of cash short or even medium term but it's all he's got.

Easier to keep it in percentages a bag is 100% and a 1000% is a 10 bag. Still surprised that there are people out there in investment land that don't know these things but hey we all learned somewhere.

Again Anton still defending RD was brought in during the deal being agreed. I doubt Total would have walked if the royalty slightly but hey you have a long track record of having a strong opinion here and that usually being wrong.

Total really did a number on RD, I mean it was gifted considering how much they will make from Uganda. It should of just been a straight up percentage royalty, no price assumptions.

Avion will likely be dropped, they were a last resort lifeline that basically saved TM a few years back, but they have been sidelined for a reason. Chances are they will be fine with it as they have shares already and warrants to exercise so will do handsomely out of a larger deal. The previous deal is not worth it now that the games changed after the patent filing and Jackson's Labs verification of findings.

Just checking back in as I still keep track here with company releases. For the record I have no skin in the game here after selling a long time ago now, at a significant loss.

What I am surprised about is the current low share price, with the forward looking project potential. The SP is lower than when I exited, so I feel for LTH's. Reading the report (can see why they haven't rushed to release this one) losses aside I think it's positive that they have been able to not only maintain but slightly increase production without new wells being drilled. However, I see that this is still a jam tomorrow play and even if this slim hole drill is successful they are still not making money on $60 oil or $4 gas. Clearly advancing the latter projects has come at a price to fundamentally pause drilling in the present.

Anyways would I invest now, honest answer no. I have no love for PH. I think if you get groundbreaking revenue changing news that will be months away. It sounds like the P3 farmout won't progress until P4 is signed off and ratified by the Georgian Government. The CCS is anybody's guess but again months away.

Good luck to all long suffering holders here, hope they do surprise you with an early RNS but I would imagine anyone who's aware of what's going on at Block won't be in a rush to take a position just yet.

Yeah you just talk it down everyday of course what silly people here. I mean you only said this AM there's no value here or interest. But let's not focus on the things you say.... Hmmmm.

Bet you would feel silly if you sold at under 10p. Agreed though looks like a leak, this is a coordinated scramble for shares.

oh **** off. no value and yet you bought shares (supposedly). why did you buy them then if they had no value that would be grade a stupidity. you're the biggest liar here... by a country mile.

It's reverse logic. The CEO says there will be a deal this year 3 times on record so the market should be moving up to try and meet that, instead it's heading back below the point where those comments were made. Completely backwards and just leaving the company open for a very low ball takeover. I mean if I was in talks now with Tim why pay hundreds of millions for a deal when I could get the whole lot for less than a £100M because PI's who are the largest holders can't hold their shares for more than 10 minutes.

This is why people don't invest in AIM a drop from 19p to 9p... Nothing has changed. What is wrong with people who the hell is selling (apart from Lanstead)? You have companies and other pharma companies nowhere near achieving anything and basically money pits with higher mcaps than this. I didn't expect us to fallback here but what it does show how rancid this market is, just algos, traders and rainbow chasers. Would this happen listed in the USA, no chance. Just need to grin and hold... Still criminal though this drop.

Too little volume and only a handful of MM's so they decide the price. If you had this kind of thing happen on the S&P 500 or the NASDAQ the feds and the Securities commission would be knocking on doors, but this is AIM where rules aren't really rules more like a gentleman's handshake with one party with their hand in the till.

Considering he's said the same things in 3 interviews is strength enough. The nominated advisor would have pulled him up the first time round, that's if they were baseless unfounded comments.

CEO's and directors are prohibited from making false, misleading or deceptive statements.

Consequences depending on severity could be fines, disqualification, compensation paid out to shareholders and the CEO aswell as the NOMAD being held personally liable for that compensation. Though whether anything would be done after an event would be questionable, but let's say there was an accusation of no negotiations actually happening and that they were made up. Then there'd be a case but if negotiations did take place but fell apart, it would be unlikely that Tim would be nailed to a wall. Though could be given the boot at an EGM.

Anyways I would say it's fair to assume based on the rules that if he has said they are in talks with possible partners then it's likely there is some form of discussion in place.

OTM you've just disproven your own point. NAV represents the total value of the assets minus liabilities and that being measured against the number of shares. IMM's total liabilities are £1.24M so even ignoring their current assets ie £500K in cash then a £100M deal would mean the company is worth £99M. I can't believe you are arguing this you are just wrong. A company sat on £100M and around £1M in liabilities is worth £99M. Reality more because you have to factor in the forward value of the deal, the tax credits and the intangible value of the IP.