Member Info for Scrodingerscat

Thank the lord. I'm not tracking his other cross ramps but I suspect he would have made more just staying put. So much for his imaginary city chums.

Some people never learn, they think that they can predict what's going to happen next. The stock market is Chaos Theory in practice, because it's 80% psychology mixed with macro and fundamentals. It's got as much chance if not more chance of consolidating higher than returning to 4p because the fundamentals have significantly shifted the psychology.

MaverickD you're not very good at trading this. Keep posting though just shows others what not to do.

otm are you thick? the interest alone on £150m would fund the company and return a few million in profit. that's £5.6m a year on the current base rate. they have a negligible amount of debt, so yes £150m is worth £150m.

have you even looked at the opex? you just make **** up.

I don't know why anyone gives OTM oxygen. He's either thick, on a wind up or just a regular bad actor. he can't see 10p on £150M and supposedly has 1.5M shares. GM I couldn't have put it better, if they had £150M the company is worth at least that. That's also ignoring the underlying IP value across the portfolio and what a deal would consitute. I'm not going to predict a price because this is purely hypothetical but the SP would be the cash value plus the markets take on how much the total value of the deal. So I'd expect 40 - 60p minimum if they landed that level of a deal as an upfront then it would either rise or fall based on milestones.

A lot of people would sell up on a deal to be replaced by those betting on a trial success, and if a trial success the fundamentals start to kick in and revenue makes the company. This is all years off even in hypothetical scenarios and chances are high they get bought out long before then if P140 really is the mustard. I would hope the board would start to increase their holding at some point outside of share awards but I suspect that with talks in play and Tim admitting that, any purchase would be viewed as insider trading possibly causing a spike of it's own.

I wasn't going to respond but show me where such a claim exists? You can't have your pants pulled down and start putting claims in people's comments that they never made.

People are judged on their contribution often knowledge being the main way people can attribute the value to a particular comment. I don't make the rules that's how society works it's why we take medical advice from health professionals and not our tarot card reader ( well most people). Your opinion is not equal to a lot of posters on here simply because you've not said a single thing that's valuable. You've brought your opinion, well done round of applause. Back it up with some knowledge or insight beyond your current approach of no substance and people may start to listen.

OTM I would just leave it there, you have proven to not know anything around what you seem to have a strong opinion about. I don't see the point in continuing engaging with you. Maybe brush up on the last few years of RNS before trying to tango with a BB that has contributors that have been following this share for in some cases a decade or more and ingested all accounts filed and every announcement up to this point.

I'm telling you the facts OTM you're the one banging on about a trial nobody else. There's no way on Earth that the mcap would be £23M for a company in a P3 for a $100B market.

The trial has not been formally acknowledged nor the next steps or timeline. So we assume it has been put on ice since the last update was the announcement of Simbec-Orion as the CRO in December 2023. Now you would know that if you weren't just a flea who hopped on here on the first of September.

Also I would add that this was £1.80 when this was last in a trial, so even accounting for dilution since then onetoomany's comments are stupid because this would be priced much much higher giving people the opportunity to exit before trial results. Any mention of a trial from the company and this will skyrocket but it looks like partner comes first as Avion seem to be noticeably absent.

Share price jumps always brings the fleas. It doesn't even matter what the SP is it's still the first step. Though I doubt as onetoomany suggests it's heading to 1p, considering it was 1.5p before the announcement and insider buying beforehand.

Like I said the other day it's worth more than last week simply on the difference of patent pending status. It may pull back further. Lanstead do want it lower but fundamentally from any metrics the company is worth more than last week. So to suggest it's going to collapse to 1p on a failed trial, when it's not even in one and backed up by a made up percentage should really highlight to everyone what the angle is here. Flea nothing more.

I think that was the key thing that Sébastien wanted to get across. It really does make chances of success much greater, considering most believed that just a higher dosing would be successful compared with the last trial.

Haha Tiger you made 35% (according to your phantom trade) there are plenty here who didn't have to do the hokey cokey that have made easy 100 - 400% selling. You just move your life savings around to the next bet on a rocket. If you had left that £9K you supposedly invested in at 1.5p like you said you would you would have been able to have sold at £36K. Your too ignorant to even realise that your telegraphs show exactly how much money you haven't made.

Tiger when are you back 4 or 6 weeks?

All I will say is this is a guy that if he had left his imaginary trades in from 1.5p would have quadrupled his money instead we are supposed to think he's some sort of guru by hopping in and out of shares and Telegraphing these phantom trades like anybody cares. The guy has missed out on 2 chances for gains of 400%+. My prediction if there is another rise he will miss that one to, because nobody can predict the stock market it's by definition a chaotic system and he has no idea when next the company will update the market. Fair play to all those who chase 10 or 20% here or there but until you've made more than Berkshire Hathaway then buying and holding undervalued stocks still remains the most successful investment strategy. Day trading not even close. 4 or 6 weeks is just nonsense.

Pebsi tell that to Incanthera.

He originally said they didn't even need to file a patent when pushed on the likelihood of a deal being secured. Well that's not the case is it now.

I've stopped judging Tim on what he says, as he is consistently inconsistent. He may come through here but that doesn't change the facts that he has on many separate occasions said things that have turned out to be false. I'm not relitigating that as it's been discussed to death here.

I think I clearly stated just today that a patent pending status means the company can now validly claim the value of developing the IP as it's current value . That obviously makes the company worth more than when originally commented. Does it make a deal more likely? Again yes but still at a cut rate. If they want to secure the best deal in my opinion you need a full patent. So although a deal is more likely today than yesterday true value extrapolation will still take many months possibly years and then there are risks of it being challenged and or denied. I have never doubted the value of the IP you can thumb through my comments. My issues have always been how this has been managed over the 7 years I've been holding.

I can acknowledge a step in the right direction, but this is not even close to the end game.

Vascular your argument is a valid one. What I would say is patent pending is much more valuable than no patent filed, while obviously an actual patent is infinitely more valuable. So IMM can now claim the value of developing the IP as the current value of the patent. Analysts would be better placed to give a valuation on that but I'd hazard a guess it's a few million £.

Tiger lives in his own reality. Chases tornadoes and often misses them. Good rise today, positive... let's hope it isn't an imm special spike. For balance and not to be confused as a prediction, simply If Tim doesn't raise this will go further.

It's sad that it's come to a place for holders that 30p a share would be a massive rise. I have not posted on here in a while but for context I have not exited but significantly reduced my holding. So I do have skin in the game but 75% less than the 140,000 shares I held at one time.

Rewind back to RD's tenure and posters on here myself included warned multiple times about the production problems, Anton at the time was adamant that they would eventually be consistently churning out 100,000 bopd from Jubilee. Enough time has passed to highlight those comments as what they actually are. I'm not here to say I told you so either. More a reality check.

There are no catalysts for share price growth, that is the harsh reality, only a bet on whether they can refinance or not. There is no immediate drilling due to no real strategy in place until the data has been thoroughly assessed. So the bonds become due before any attempt to address production declines, add to the IEA forecasting lower oil prices in 2026 and a plummeting credit rating. It really does look like that the most likely result will be some form of insolvency or cheap buyout. The fact that the CEO has not been replaced is a strong indicator that the BOD are limping this towards satisfying the debt holders at the expense of equity holders. I of course would be happy to be wrong on this but the signs are clear TLW simply can't survive with oil prices at $60 and this level of debt.

RD is entirely to blame for this predicament no question and where people used to line up and defend him, even now they must admit that his leadership ultimately has cost us all a lot of money.

Cherry picking what I said and amending to suit your narrative. I never used the word superstar. I also mentioned the Incanthera warrants, director pay cuts and deferalls, an audit to focus on funds prioritising research on best commercial outcomes and a revised business plan. These were all just off the top of my head.

I will leave you to your illustrious party members who don't know what an Independent director is, you are in fine company.

You have no point. This Napoleon complex you have really is quite concerning. You resorted to making counter opinions personal, you asked me what I would do differently and then resorted to childishness. So again because I'm not of state pension age and a net contributor how are you subsidising me? Apology accepted.

Though I'm sure paying tax gets you a standing ovation down the local. Doesn't really work on an investment BB where I assume (why you didn't shows you can't read a room) most people who are able to invest have a bob or 2 to spare anyways. Contributors will have some level of capital because they are able to buy shares and by definition that at the least means paying stamp duty reserve on share purchases and capital gains if not done through an allowance vehicle.

The only posturing I can see is pure projection, you are under water just like everyone else is. You have every right to remain positive about your investment but you cannot expect everybody else to remain as positive as you because there are too many unknowns and concern's about how this business has and is being currently run. Holding the board to account on the information it releases and the words that come out of the Chief Executives mouth is not an attack on any individual on this board. Yet you ride to attack whoever dares utter any annoyance with how things are going. You are the least balanced person on here by a country mile.

"They were wrong and he was right. The obvious, the silly and the true had got to be defended. Truisms are true, hold on to that! The solid world exists, its laws do not change. Stones are hard, water is wet, objects unsupported fall towards the earth’s centre."