Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
That’s a perfectly valid assessment ReoninV. Personally I think if something can be improved upon then it should, especially if the company is listed. This is a fairly straightforward fix and at the moment we have little to no interest in the ‘L’ series. We’ll never know whether changing things would make any difference because they haven’t tried. Not arguing with you and your response is welcome, but I am bothered when another company in a similar space does make more of an effort.
Nice response and points well made, so thanks.
Haggis, you might just be surprised at the level of experience some have on this board regarding marketing, web design and large scale project management. I can assure you that I can more than hold my own in this department. As a general rule of thumb, when little things are being missed it’s because someone either can’t be bothered, is too busy, can’t afford to rectify it or doesn’t feel it’s worthwhile. AFC can afford it and it’s definitely worthwhile, so we’re left with can’t be bothered and too busy, or both. At the point the company overlook these it’s generally time to bring in someone to sort it out. Only my opinion, but the point of info and contact should reflect the company, and in this case it does, unfortunately. I’m allowed to be critical of a company without de-ramping. Minimal cost, maximum exposure. I’d even do it free of charge but they don’t reply to my emails. It simply isn’t acceptable that a company with this tech doesn’t even try to sell itself. I’m sure you’ll hate my post, which is your right, but AFC are an engineering/tech company which has an outdated, boring website. I guess if they want to look outdated and boring it’s ok though. Personally I’d prefer them to look and feel as though they care about the environment, the planet and their customers.
Bloom also have a good looking website, which we don’t. Mentioned because there has been some recent discussion about ours, which does look a bit rubbish in comparison and is a cheap and easy fix. Not sure why someone hasn’t sorted it already.
CB, that’s rubbish. I’ve seen several rampy comments removed from there. It’s actually pretty balanced and certainly better without you.
I don’t think any holder minds being wrong or indeed reading genuine criticism of the company. What does bother me is the repetition, day after day. Garonne, Number, Ade, Blockme are probably the same person or working together. I’ve no idea whether it works as a tactic or whether paid rampers/derampers are an actual thing; I just know that it kills genuine debate and causes friction. If someone posts the same thing every day, despite being asked to reign it in a bit, then says that they will and are only doing it out of concern, has an agenda and it shouldn’t be acceptable.
I accept the price drop which is across many sectors and whilst I’m not ‘delighted’ at the progress this year, it has still been very good. Still a risk but all to play for as we head into 2022.
I’m pretty chilled thanks, but ‘lol’ isn’t a term I’d expect from a genuine holder.
You: same garbage about holding and trading whilst almost euphoric about price drops.
Garonne: Posting negativity day after day after day.
Ade: See above, but a know-it-all.
It’s uncanny how often the other two appear together on here. Suddenly we’re in the 40’s and they’ve gone quiet.
Maybe you all work for Schroders?
Number, there’s no way on earth that you’re holding long term and trading a separate account. Trading only imo. In fact, you remind me of ‘yellowf1’ in many ways. Which shareholder in their right mind would be hoping for further drops? You must think we’re stupid.