RE: sage24 May 2022 11:19
I feel GROW has the potential to play an important role in discovering and helping develop European tech champions.
And let's face it, they are desperately needed and European politicians get this. I would go so far as to say even Jeremy Corbyn recognised this with a manifesto commitment to manage the transition to automation.
The US has led the way with Japan, South Korea and now China.
A Tesla car, a Huawei phone, Amazon cloud, Salesforce software, You Tube videos, Apple gadgets, Fanuc robots, Nvidia chips, Netflix entertainment, Moderna and Pfizer RNA vaccines (yeah BioNTech but Pfizer funded), SpaceX rockets.
If it had been left to Europe none of this would have got off the ground. Either through under developed capital markets or over developed ones where all that remains is to suck out every last penny in dividends for as long as possible.
So we can all sit with our cynicism and scoff at how overvalued and overfunded tech companies are and enjoy the show as they face funding troubles and fail to deliver on their grand promises.
Maybe one reason why some don't quickly turn a profit is because they are building and defining a market, thinking about the sustainability of scalable returns and seeking to capture all the opportunities that exist.
Times like this can also be beneficial for VC funded companies as their partners can adopt a tougher approach. Google was given a kick up the arse by their investors, which prompted them to start looking at how they could start using their data on user searches to make products for advertisers.
So I think you have to be in it to win it and it takes time to build a business. There's a reason why "value" stocks were lagging the tech stocks for so long and that is because some of these businesses will fall by the wayside due to disruption.