Me views etc15 Jan 2021 10:28
First, I was getting worried about the grant, I am pleased to hear it is coming through- I was thinking I bet the Spanish have a few financial problems they didn’t expect.
Also, I thought and think we get 80% of the APT price for our concentrate. The SHARD report says that they modelled things on the la Parilla WO3 at 80% of APT price. The FID said they expected laprilla product to price at 80% of the APT price. I understand understand we get 80% of price as part of the offtake. Our concentrate has always been stated at 66% purity, the world ands his wife knows that to be la Parilla ‘product’. So for me we get 80%. However, I also spotted the missing money as described by L200, however, however, accounting can be a funny thing and what was produced, shipped, money for are not always the same thing. I suppose once we have final figures we can get a better view.
With regard to the loans, the Blackrock one is punitive, no doubt. However, increasing production and increasing prices increases EBITDA ( economies of a scale and improving margins are a good thing imho) which should put us on position to refinance the loan at a lower rate, which would be a very good thing. Producing more is good no doubt.
The Regua thing was always to be an add on, and there have been delays and a fair bit of changes on the how of it too. However, shipping partially processed high grade ore should be a considerable help in quantity produced. The economies of scale on lager production offers improvements that are more exponential than linear. We really do need production improvements and we are told that is happening. A goodly increase in tungsten price is also good.