Member Info for safetyman

Wilbur; that really is an interesting nugget........and I didn’t mention gold in this conversation either.

I like cars, I haven’t driven one that I didn’t enjoy, if they are crap it makes it challenging. I speak as a man that drove to work through the snow in a hillman hunter. ‘If’ Wres does as I hope , it will definitely be a Porsche test drive at least con your recommendation. I dare not have a test drive prior otherwise if I like it too much I will get in a terrible state with meself.

Thanks Ivan’s, that’s good to see.

Seawolf, no one will buy these at 60p as Wres is. However, we’re it to achieve MMS original projections in the FID etc, then easily so.
60 p would be good imho.

Indeed. Seawolf. I am positive, would like to think if I put more in it would be a good thing. I have sold some over the past 18 months, due to circumstance, but have bought back some in the .10 to .17 range. Wished I was buying them back know. However, in the interest of proportional risk management I don’t mind putting the spare cash in, but not in excess of that.

MIB, to be honest if this goes down, the Beamer goes and I will be a reduced motorist with me old cabriolet and a golf. If it goes up it’s holidays to Japan and Italy and I will look to get me daughter a place in Spain. The are things I would like to do before shedding the mortal coil. If it gets really good I might go for a Porsche never had or of them.

Yes lots of ‘ifs’.
After we consolidate we will have a more respectable SP in terms of what investors look at.
If we increase production based on productivity
If we also increase production from higher grade ore
If we increase production from going to 7 days a week from 5
If we get Regua on line with its very good ore
If because of increased production we get increased interest from investors the SP goes up
If we get some or all of th
e above, refinancing at a lower interest rate becomes mor likely
If we get the grant money showing up it will at least inprove sentiment and reduce loans
If the gold comes on line later in the year

If some of all that happens it’s good, if all of it then it’s spiffing in my opinion.!
If none of it happens, then I would say it’s bad in my opinion.

I look forward to my gaviscon celebration!
I think we can all agree; if we get increased production then all manner of good things can happen. Personnely, I think that’s going to happen and would sell if I didn’t think so.

GUG, the original wording of that saying was; you can’t eat your cake and have it too. Some dude thought it had better meaning the other way round. All semantics I suppose.

It occurs to me that it’s a good job we are not Hittites. They had a hexadecimal system. So multiplying by a decimal 100 would get right complicated, now that would be a conversion. However, we are not Hitites, so I will divide me number of shares by a hundred to estimate how many I will have. Similarly, I will multiply the SP by a hundred to get the SP.

Oportunity for communication clearly referred to, It says in the RNS “ Should Shareholders wish to raise any questions ahead of the General Meeting please, they are requested to do so via email at investor@wresources.com.”

I would start a positive news flow. Looks like it will not rain in the area around Merida for the next 8 days.

GUG, you state it’s incorrect to say no one will lose anything. I thought we wouldn’t lose out except for the tiny big for the WWF penny or fractions of a penny stuff. Have I missed something?

MIB- yep.

Blimey toung, if we consolidate by a hundred and then we get back to 7 billion that would be as dilute as a homeopathic solution

OK chaps; what questions are you considering?

Well Joey, I think we have all lost money so far, so that’s common ground for anyone invested. If we keep improving on production that will change. Let’s hope for soon.

Better thanks GUG. I use gaviscon advanced, it’s got other stuff in it that makes it work better.
The AGM will be interesting, I wonder if anyone will be raising any questions?

Will rise. Not quite in the way hoped for. However, it makes sense to do it based on what the RNS says.
Now if we could have a RNS with increased production that would be nice.

GUG , I read your post, and as you said ‘here is his answer’ I read it to mean here was an answer to him. My apologies if you feel I only skim your posts and am not paying them enough attention.
Also you have been very magnanimous in instructing L200 to allow us to think what we want. So big thanks for that.
I do make mistakes, to be fair, probably due to a lack of omniscience, age and poor education. In fact take off contract should be, off take contract. The fact that it’s not all in the public domain I believe is quite usual with contracts as there is the commercial confidence malarkey.well that’s my understanding of these matters. I think there are other things too that we are not told for the same reason eg the jig and mill **** up and what’s in the contract on redressing that. Then there are my views, which I do point out are just that.
Well me gaviscon is making me burp now, so I can go back to sleep.
Perhaps a good old RNS in the morning to bring hearty cheer to us investors and to uninvested posters too.