Member Info for rustybucket

Could be very simply that someone has sold a large chunk of their standard life investment and standard life have rebalanced the portfolio. If they had sold all or a large proportion of their holding it would be very worrying but its a fraction. Could be from pensions where someone vesting or just an opportunity elsewhere. That's what fund managers are paid for. They do rebalance on a regular basis.

A director has shares vesting, yet sells them at this level. Why ??? If you have confidence in the business. I can sometimes accept people selling some of them to pay a tax bill, but this doesn't make sense. Anyone like to try and make sense of this for me. ?

Standard life wont be getting jittery, they take a long term view. Its the investors in the funds they are invested in who get the jitters pull their money out and force fund managers to sell stock.

Go over to RHTM after change of name.

As Lundon79 has said he was voting against Suranga with 1m shares. There was only a total of another 3m voted against. Wonder why ?? wHAT EXACTLY IS HE BRINGING TO PARTY

ANYONE BEEN TO A.G.M ??

Bloody hell chigs ! and I thought I was in a bad way

Name change, get rid of the negatives surrounding the old blinky regime and move on. Hopefully to a dynamic profit making company. With a share price that increases.

What about a ( Labour estimate ).

Please someone explain why we needed a price monitoring extension at 12.05. Normally this happens when there is a lot of trading and price goes up or down by more than a pre-determined amount. What am I missing ??? There were virtually no trades and the UT was the princely amount of 533 shares. What is going on here ?? na

Even if these bunch of muppets sent a positive message to the market in "plain English" it would help get share price moving. But based on the past that is to much to expect. They are an advertising company and they cant even advertise themselves. About time these guys came out kicking and screaming about a product which actually works and makes money. I have seen progress in the offering in the last 2 years. What I don't know is whether it is making money and will increase its exposure. The quancast figures make for very misleading information and it would be helpful to have it explained why there are the massive differences in viewing figures.

How the hell can the bod know who a person is. We are faceless. I could be Lord Sugar and no-one knows any difference. Madness to say board read this. They should be too busy making this work. I could go and say I am pensioner 167 STT sbumbag or biffa. How would they know whether thats true or not. Madness.

Oh no. An error occurred. It wont work. Hope its not run by Blinky.

This is like walking on the moon. Tiny steps not knowing what is going to happen. Tiny positive steps then you fall into a big manhole and have to start again. There are tiny shoots of positivity. A product that looks as if it "may" be starting to work. I certainly hope so. It has already been a long and winding road. It is like falling down a big cliff. We did not actually fall and die. Clinging onto hope. Will someone rescue us or does the product actually have enough attraction to advertisers to start making us some money. ?? I hope so.

You go into these links. ....... And they work. That has got to be a massive step up on the previous offerings. Maybe, just maybe, there maybe hope. Or, Maybe not. Time will tell.

Hope on the 238m it was a campaign and we made some money

it was actually worse. 01-Jun-16 10:52:14 21.25 12,951 Sell* 21.25 23.50 2,752 A 2.25 spread

Also large spread most of day. When the trade was made I am sure it was something like 21.25 to 23.

it was saying nearly 9.25% for a second when they activated an a trade.

Shroder. Any idea what the criteria is for the banding. ??