DESNZ - a law unto itself3 Jun 2025 10:36
I asked AI how renewables manage to avoid Treasury scrutiny (probably why RR treats them as someone else's problem)
"The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) does not entirely avoid Treasury scrutiny by funding initiatives through utility bill levies. While levies can provide a degree of financial autonomy, they are still subject to oversight and regulatory frameworks.
Treasury Oversight and Levies
Historically, the UK government has utilized levies on energy bills to fund green energy schemes. The Levy Control Framework (LCF), established in 2011, was designed to cap the amount energy companies could recover from consumers for such initiatives. However, there have been concerns about the transparency and parliamentary oversight of these levies. The National Audit Office noted that including LCF revenues within departmental accounts could lead to inconsistencies with international financial reporting standards. As a result, since 2011/12, the Department for Energy and Climate Change (a predecessor to DESNZ) obtained a derogation from the Treasury to exclude LCF revenues from supplementary estimates and departmental accounts. Instead, audited reports on LCF revenues were presented to Parliament separately. Despite these measures, MPs have urged the government to enhance parliamentary scrutiny over funds raised and spent through energy bill levies.
Recent Developments
In recent years, there have been shifts in how green levies are funded. For instance, the cost of certain levies was temporarily moved from consumer bills to be funded by the government to alleviate the cost of living crisis. However, this decision was reversed, and from July 2023, the Treasury ceased covering these charges, transferring the cost back to consumers. This move faced criticism from some MPs who argued that it was unfair to burden households with additional costs.
Conclusion
While funding through utility bill levies can offer DESNZ some flexibility, it does not exempt the department from Treasury scrutiny. There are established frameworks and oversight mechanisms to ensure transparency and accountability in how these funds are raised and utilized. However, the effectiveness and adequacy of these oversight measures continue to be subjects of parliamentary discussion and review."
I think that they (Labour) handed Ed too much autonomy. I think the Tories exacerbated it and under the smokescreen of a vaguely hypothecated tax (windfall) raised desperately need money. This was extended to 2030 so both administrations effectively duped the public and used the EPL to take pressure of other areas e.g. NHS and immigration. Basically demonising and punishing the O&G industry. One of the few industries that can stand on its own feet if treated fairly compared to other industries.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
