Member Info for RogerJolly

😂😂🤣

POC = No more red tape on further discoveries.

Here we go

USDS - Long lead items were already in situ from spring last year. From a question I asked at the AGM, it seemed clear they had a particular rig in mind and they had already held preliminary talks with rig suppliers.

The plan has been indicated that the NT2 test will take place in the summer to establish the well head equipment required for connection etc. This was to be done with in-country equipment.

Ch1 will require a rig and following that they planned to rework NT1 with the same rig.

Beyond that we await for details of the FFD plans.

Just seen the movement is there a leak?

One ticks premium at .79 would have returned 1.04 However it has all but doubled.

We might find out what else is in the bottom of the barrel later.

I'm not woodturning today so he can borrow my scraper if he likes 😜

Yes that's twice this week

Passed*

UT yesterday was 1.63 as a day high but trades never past 1.6

Clowns to left Jokers to the right if in the middle don't kick the skirting boards. The rats are still at play

They should know now whether the sidetrack frilling has been successful and as they said now we just have to wait to for a further week to see the levels of production they can attain. 🤞

Well whatever it turns out to be there won't be any taxes to pay for a while

As I explained the difference between the survey and the study. I can't be clearer than I have been. Goodnight

Let's hope it gives those sort of returns 👍

Perhaps if you were to read my posts properly you would know. I told everyone before and I've told you since why I feel the way I do. It's in black and white and I'm not going to keep repeating it. 🙄

Yes goodnight. Give it a rest for five minutes.

Perhaps if you had questioned my reasoning rather than attempt to belittle me with the typical ad hominem attacks you specialise in, you wouldn't have received the response you got.

Move on, stick to debating the subject, its much more pleasant and we all learn things that way and we all get on better.

I dont doubt it will be July

It is you supporting the other guy that is creating worry that it my not be.

I've explained my position and wont again. You have constantly questioned the board for all the year I've known you. Always creating doubt. The mirror is for you my friend, not me.

Btw SC When I dud the sums a few weeks ago based on price per barrel I got similar total value, which is why I questioned why nobody was talking about. Even if they get 10% of it out, it still holds massive value.

For those wondering what it is.... Condensate is a mixture of light liquid hydrocarbons, similar to a very light (high API) crude oil. It is typically separated out of a natural gas stream at the point of production (field separation) when the temperature and pressure of the gas is dropped to atmospheric conditions.

I thought Jay was talking that way back in the day. Perhaps Crusty or Ufufuo can confirm?

Crusty you accuse me of doing exactly what you do yourself. Do you really expect no response?

"And that from the person that always used to tell us not to speculate on second guessing the BoD but to take what the BoD tell the shareholders at face value as they are the people that most know what is going on."

Just think about that coming from yourself who for years has continually second guessed what was going on despite the boards reassurances. To make that accusation against me is a bit hypocritical don't you think when all of a sudden now you can see a negative connotation you wish to use the boards word as being gospel 🤔

I made it very clear it was my opinion based on logic both on here and in private to you. I've asked the questions which nobody has answered. Which of you would buy a property without doing the survey first?

We are talking 34 km of expensive land and compensation paid here, and most probably 200 meters wide. Does anybody really think a land survey was not done?

Let's see what you quoted of me "RJ, you state that " I don't believe for one second that this survey is not already completed."

I certainly did because that is what I think most logical, but note 'Survey' v 'Study'

Personally I would see a survey as a way of finding out what problems and issues may be faced, and, on a land purchase this size, I'd expect it to take months, if not a year or more. The results of which would then be studied to see how they can overcome those problems. Once the results of the study are written which is the part of the process I second guess is taking place at the moment, then those wishing to tender will know the requirements they need to meet.

All I have done is to break down the process into its parts.

In private you agreed with me that it is just a process. I am just lost as to why on here you appear to be taking a different view.

In reality it will come when it comes and right now given the wealth of publicity out there, there is no reason for anybody to suspect and create fear over the tender process being released in July as stated.

Even if it was delayed a further month; compared to the last seven years what difference would it make. I suggest buggarall difference.