Member Info for RogerJolly

They se two million shares were worth £214,000 less than a year ago, they are wirth £28,000 at cop today. Do you think she is happy losing £190k in that time? She has options to buy at 6p and unless this share gets there she is not going to recover her losses any more than anybody else who was spike here.

This is a none issue, false flag, red herring whichever way people want to describe it.

*sum

It is hard on here to recognise genuine people and I understand over the years I've bern guilty on calling it out wrong on some. Mostly I can pick out the dodgy ones but yes, you some up my feelings nicely. It is not wrong to disagree with each other, that is debate, but when one proves the other wrong, the other should concede and take what they have learned and not throw a verbal wobbly as so many do in the world we live today.

Quote me Js dont pathetically try to defame me. My post record is there for you to do just that. Put up or shut up.

Well OSG I do tend to start my own threads, I always have but they are and will always be truthful. You accept the point I'm making as does Skippy so it shouldn't be an issue. It is concerning that so many are missing it. Is that deliberate or naivety? You can judge for yourself, but as well as the bashers I've fought long and hard against it can't be denied there are people ignoring the truth on the other side. As I said, maybe I should just shut up until back in, but guess what will happen then? Those complaining now will want me as their buddy again because of the very truth I put out to counter the bashers who will then be screaming ramper at me. Truth is, the honest guy in the middle ground just can't win. Hey ho such is life. It seems the truth is only wanted when it conforms to the ideas of those reading it. Good luck

Sorry for semi repeated posts. Must have gone off before I had finished editing

To OSG and those ticking you up in that post, I agree, as far as I know Noble have been talking to Off Takers about funding downstream and I am very supportive of that model as I have argued for in the last two weeks however, in your own comment you are missing out the meaning of a key word "happy to fund the downstream " "DOWNSTREAM" What does that mean to you? as Crusty pointed out earlier downstream is not appraisal, well testing or further exploration. Down stream is taking the gas and funding the processing equipment. What that means for both them and us is that each have to fund their own way to get to that stage. I can't change that, I only wish I could

I don't want good people to lose the way I did. I openly declared my position so I'm not trying to con anybody and you know how I fought the bad guys over recent months in fact a year or more. In the case of HE1 "CONDITIONAL is the keyword in the case of Noble "DOWNSTREAM" is the word

It's up to you if you ignore it. I haven't and I have simply lessoned my risk. Perhaps I best just shut up and ignore the both sides BS until I am back in and having to fight it again on my own behalf

OSG and those ticking you up in that post, I agree as far as I know Noble have been talking to Off Takers about funding downstream and I am very supportive of that model as I have argued for in the last two weeks however, in your own comment you are missing out the meaning of a key word "happy to fund the downstream " "DOWNSTREAM" What does that mean? as Crusty pointed out earlier downstream is not appraisal, well testing or further exploration. Down stream is taking the gas and funding the processing equipment. What that means for both them and us is that each have to fund their own way to get to that stage.

I'm trying to make people understand here so they don't lose the way I did. I openly declared my position so I'm not trying to con anybody and you know how I fought the bad guys. In HE1 case "CONDITIONAL is a key word in Nobles "DOWNSTREAM"

JS there is nothing wrong with face value being taken on the truth. If you can't handle things when the truth turns against you, don't try laying that on me. If you want to retain your capital you have to move with it or be swallowed up by the system and the real shysters on here. Don't even think of putting me in with that sort of scum.

Right now you have day trading rampers pumping and dumping for a 2 or 3% rinse and repeat on the other hand you have the opposite deramping who are highly likely the very same people. I am neither. If you can't accept that, then move on and block me.

I think these things need 100,000 before it gets a chance of being put through parliament.

The FCA have the powers to ban it and are supposedly independent reporting to the treasury but their fee structure is at 10 levels from £250 per business to £200,000 per business. Which ones do you think will have more clout with the FCA? and which ones do you think would be handling much of the shorting?

I really have no idea who the individual companies are, but I can guess who holds the power and it isn't the FCA imo

Why are you disappointed? I fought against the the bashers and your lover boys deramping lies through out even when it appeared you were being sucked in by him. Now the situation has changed and further information has been published would you prefer I start lying about it? I'll stick with pointing out the facts thanks. What you do with it, is up to you. You don't see me saying it will be 2p or .5p tomorrow. I have every confidence long term here, but if you can't or won't see things that I can, then I will be of no use to you until my views change on the current position. This is holding up my campervan order, do you think I want this?

JS it always has been, Don't play that game

Are you describing the 837026 trades? It looks like a £500 hit between 10:51 and 15:15. I'd have thought Bed ISAs would have been already completed for this season with a new one only about 3 weeks away.

Big hit if the same person though.

I'd love that to happen and to have a chance then it needs spamming to every board possible but LSE will end up blocking it. There is too much money being made out of it by the big boys and the brokers etc

Nothing better than a nice big slice of home made steak and kidney. Mmmmm

Roger65 did I catch you on the wrong side of your day trade? Oh well I know you now wont see my reply, but I do wonder what part of this company quote you didn't understand "Conditional upon these results, the Company will then be in a position to advance discussions with off-takers and industry partners"

If it bites you in the ass then don't say the clues weren't pointed out. If you get lucky and sail through then good luck to you, I actually hope you do.

There is very good reason why not to box people because you learn things from each other as I did when I made my mistakes.

"Conditional upon these results, the Company will then be in a position to advance discussions with off-takers and industry partners"

This was a key point for me and only when people truly get to grips about what that means between now and then, will they understand that no money is on the table until satisfactory results are provided from the upcoming tests, appraisals or both. Meanwhile everything has to be funded by the company in whatever way it can.

How you think that will be achieved is for you to decide.

On a scale of 1 to 10 what is your confidence level?

Cards on the table, I sold prior to the jetting to add to what I thought would move quicker. I don't class myself as a trader, certainly not a regular one.

I got lucky both ways in that respect and can now buy back at around half the price so I'd like to gauge the honest mood of those on board at this time.

Right now I am still aware that if this side track is successful and brings home the sort of numbers that were expected before the issues then this could well be a long term hold for dividends following full field development.

Just reading the 28th Feb RNS once more, I note that they have enough funds to complete the next schedule, but they do make reference that £1.4million plus vat will be required between May and August to pay off a variety of contractors, which they admit relies on the funding coming from post side track revenues. Obviously we know a failure would mean more capital requirements for both that debt and further exploration.

I personally have no experience of the success rates of side tracking of wells so any thoughts on that will be appreciated. Thanks

I'm still smarting here from the bad results prior to the reverse takeover and after averaging down and obviously I want to avoid another hit on it.

Coconut for Rojo. Yes that was it. Get some in!

I don't suppose that was your recommendation to buy? ;0)

You'd best get on writing then. Dont want it to be late. You've also got to write the party manifesto for the next election :0)

Btw what was the TV comedy called where Richard Lindsey made his name before Citizen Smith? It was about RAF recruits