RE: New highs - but VLE still trades some way below true value3 Jun 2020 13:48
Mytton's comment about VLE management's fabulous track record and the potential for more acquisitions being worth an additional premium is a good one.
Obviously Shire's tangible assets and liabilities are already included in VLE's NAV, i.e the net of the freehold property, the borrowings against it, the stock, debtors/creditors, leasing liabilities etc etc.
An acquiror will pay an amount for the business as a whole, which would comprise its valuation of the ongoing core profitable business plus an amount covering the surplus property, debtors etc which it will take over.
It's impossible to separate the two as beauty is in the eye of the beholder! My thinking is that a buyer must pay up a multiple for the future/ongoing profitability of the business, as well as something realistic for the excess tangible assets.
So the ongoing business is not included in my valuation, only the tangible assets already in the NAV.
Another thought - there may be hidden upside in the freehold property, which hasn't been revalued since December 2017.