Member Info for RedRoger

Unfortunately owing to a serious knee injury, my mobility is somewhat limited the past four weeks.

But I notice Butterworth and the other wokes resort to deflection when their agenda is under investigation. Truth is they have no defence for any of the tripe they push, only to try and cancel or deflect.

So who can tell me, where is the official list of things that are offensive?

For example, would labelling somebody an imbecile be abuse? If so, are you committing hate crime on here?

Define abuse. Words are not weapons

But which words can you not use? Where is the list so that there is no ambiguity?

We can't have laws against rac.ism and simultaneously have jobs for black people only - but we do?

So who is making up all this nonsense and where can I read the rules?

So are you saying that debating societies are where the laws are laid for what is deemed offensive and to whom?

Or are you ducking the question? What is the discrete list of offensive terms, where can it be found and referred to before conversing with someone who might take offence at the slightest thing?

Quady, as the saying goes - you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. But I'll humour you, let's try.

Where is the (peer reviewed) official public list of things that are offensive?

Who decided what is offensive and how and why?

If there is no such official list, then how does any one person know what another might find offensive?

And if being offended is subjective, then surely the problem is those who take offence for not putting into law what they find to be offensive?

This is the problem with trying to shut down or censor free speech. The rules depend on who sets them and why they do it.

Offense is taken not given. Toughen up buttercup.

Adore women, and if I play my cards right there will be another notch on the bedpost tomorrow

Maybe so Aqua woke, but I tend to get rid of them fairly quickly anyway. Their knickers can't come off soon enough when they see the trappings of my lifestyle. That allows me to get what I want then move on to the next!

I love them, the more the better.

Fair play to those of you who stick with one, but I'd get bored of the same nagging old trout day in day out

Quady, get yourself out and chase some snatch!

To all good Christian people. To non-believers, it's not too late

To other faiths....f*** off and get out of our country, things are about to get more difficult for you to hate us.

I don't hate women, that's why I don't spend my money in places with appalling human rights records such as Bahrain who oppress and discriminate against them.

I have no problem with other races but a massive problem with the positive discrimination, anti-white DEI nonsense that has infected our public institutions, services and even corporate companies now. I have no prejudices against them, but reserve my right to have preferences.

I've never incited violence, but to be clear in the event that someone commits a crime then it is their action and never the fault of anybody else.

If I told you to walk off a cliff edge, would you do it?

"Half of the people on this board voted for Scott at the AGM "

I was very vocal about the reasons I rejected Caldwell and voted against him at the AGM, As with nearly everything in life, I appear to be in the minority but I am always right

When will you sheep wake up?

What good would options be above the current share price when he can just buy as many as he likes at that price?

Certainly room for confusion when a dipstick like Quady is involved.

Agreed, but if a company crossed a 1% threshold either way, there would be mass masturbation on this forum

Copper is the bellwether of the economy and with a long overdue recession surely now nailed on, I see short term prices dropping. Add into that the slow realisation from the sheep of this world that Nut Zero is an infeasible fantasy and you will get lower copper demand

Gold on the other hand continues to go from strength to strength as the latest failure in fiat unfolds. Fiat always fails and we always go back to gold...

Max, there are price sensitivity grids in the PFS you can use to extrapolate the NAV based on increased metal prices

Would be interesting to see what our PFS rates us at on current spot prices. (I CBA to look but its on the presentation)

Its's 50% + 1 share addicknt, not 51%

There is a 30,000,000 share difference or thereabouts between the two

50% + 1 share

Amuses when posters on here say things like "I won't take less than x per share" - it literally won't be in their hands in the event of an offer