Member Info for RedRoger

I can do a running commentary as well if you like, on the phone, in a dirty voice.

Exactly, I'm pleased somebody else realises it was never an actual thing. Only the morons here ever thought it was.

I'm doing a livestream of my Inbox from 4pm tomorrow so people a bit further down the pecking order can see what arrives.

Always been one of the strong favourites to take this IMO. I don't see it going to the Chinks

Is that all about then? A mention of a company of which he's director that is about to be struck off companies house, and a link to a load of blurb of biomarkers

There are quite a few petty wokes who use this board who complain about posts and have them taken down. Not sure what they're so concerned about other than somebody might read something that they don't agree with.

Feeble minded busybodies

"Someone from BHPs M&A team should be able to guide you Roge.

Tandy doesn't need to be that attractive IMO. It just needs to provide quick, relatively cheap access to about 2-4m oz of gold equivalent. The reason for this is simple; Alpala is the main prize but without the starter pit you've got a few years and a few billion quid to go through."

Bozi, the fundamental flaw in this strategy is achieving permits/licences to dig Tandayama. Would that entail another 5+ years waiting for our CEO and the Ecuadorean government to get their fingers out of their backsides and actually do something?

It's only at MRE stage. By the time they've dine 8 PFS iterations and spent a couple of years translating it into French, the bull run in metals will be long gone

Bozi, give me a number/email for someone who will answer that question and I'll gladly ask it.

My point was the risk is that if Tandy is attractive, Alpala might well then be worthless as it's too complex and too expensive to build.

But with metal prices rerating (as was inevitable after fiat printing), the economics change. The prize is that gold and it's a prize that is getting ever more valuable by the day. Just imagine if the world's top three military powers decided between them to have a gold backed standard....

The majors are cash rich, they don't need "low hanging fruit" to fund a block cave mine. What may happen though is they tie up with a middleweight who develops Tandy while they get on with Alpala.

In my opinion, we're getting close to the onset of irrational knee jerk reactions as it becomes obvious the world is now battling for gold. Heavily predicted is a new gold backed reset of fiat.

Those without gold reserves will be spending every penny to get at physical gold. Not long now.

Could the reason simply be that if they proved Tandy up and it was better economically, then nobody would bother with the pig they've been slapping lipstick on for 8 years?

Tandayama is a bit like the jelly round a pork pie. It might be of interest to some, but most would just discard it and get straight to the meat.

I doubt it changes how a major views Cascabel

Hmmm, maybe the market doesn't think we're commencing construction in a few weeks then?

The market, and the entire world apart from one brain dead "investor"

More than likely!

Is it me or has the website had a lick of paint?

Try reading the RNS not an Ecuadorian comic

The program is expected to commence in early May 2025, utilising three drilling rigs to establish resources in the measured and indicated categories, define limits to near surface mineralisation, and test for open pittable at or near surface resources on which expedited open pit mining activities may be commenced. The program is expected to take approximately three months with assay results available a month later.

Quady, not being funny but are you actually autistic? Are you taking the first part of that translated article literally?

The RNS told us what they're doing at Tandayama, they are drilling some holes....to see if there's anything there. That is NOT "pressing on with open pit production"

I think you suffer from autism/tunnel vision. A bit like when you refused to accept that BHP wanted 70% from our stake in ENSA and you thought it meant 70% of our 85% and calculated that meant 59.5% of ENSA. You take things far too literally and never stop to think rationally.

Heading over soon - and I don't mean Quady

No thanks, I possess a functioning brain and a decent vocabulary. I don't need to sheepishly copy everything others say.

Very, really, extremely, awfully - there are many words you can choose but it's super super super in every sentence with you brain dead sheep.

Super excited for Friday?

Let's hope they haven't doubled it

Almost exactly the size of the 0.6% open short

What is it with your generation and the incessant use of "super" as an adverb?