Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
The purpose of a walk down is to scare (mostly) Retail Investors into selling. And then mop up a cheaper recovery stock. Holders deliberately loan to shorters who help drip-drip the price down, and then the buy back sets in. Some mop up big time. Some shorters make a profit, some get badly burnt, since the buy back isn't just for them. The original holders are still very much in the game.
The fundamentals haven't changed. Cash flow is getting stronger, debt will get repaid over time, big films are coming online.
It's always darkest just before dawn.
Just bear in mind, some of the big rises will be overnight when market is closed to most RIs. This is the game.
Looks like a deliberate slow walk down. Takeover is currently set at 125pence based on 12 month high.
If you want Cine cheaper you need the walk down. Some big holders will want this. The main holders will lend shares to the shorters. The shorters will probably not sell borrowed stock initially, but on a drip basis over time. The SP is very vulnerable to low volumes so this is easier for them to do this so they can then buy back at the lowest price and then make their profit.
The risk will be when the bottom is reached and it suddenly bounces as it almost certainly will. Probably with a series of significant over night increases small Risk will not normally be able to buy into.
This makes it a holding game.
The business model is still sound. It's simply waiting for the poker players to be called and forced to show their hands when the probably bottom is reached. If/when small RIs fold the pot for the big boys grows.
*sorry for the typos*
Looks like a deliberate slow walk down. Takeover is currently set at 125pence based on 12 month high.
If you want Cine cheaper you need the walk down. Some big holders will want this. The main holders will lend shares to the shorters. The shoetrees will probably not sell borrowed stock initially, but on a drip basis over time. The SP is very vulnerable to low volumes so this is easier for them to do this so they can then buy back at the lowest price and then make their profit.
The risk will be when the bottom is reached and it suddenly bounces as it almost certainly will. Probably with a series of significant over night increases small Risk will not normally be able to buy into.
This makes it a holding game.
The business model is still sound. It's simply waiting for the poker players to be called and forced to show their hands when the probably bottom is reached. If/when small RIs fold the pot for the big boys grows.
think of this differently.
This is probably as bad as it gets. The whole market is down across europe right now. Dow futures to boot.
The shorters out there are probably at the end of their play. The fact that the SP is still this high (yes, I did say that) is likely a cause of serious concern for the shorters.
Unless you WANT to trigger a drop and buy in again at the lower price. In which case. Just cancel the stop order when things start to move. Works both ways.
Lesson is use stops manually. Nothing formal that is visible to the market. Stop-loss hunters need to see what they hunt.
BOA must have bought in between 103 and 105 pence, depending on time of day
This is just basic psychology.
In investment banking it's called a 'delta spike'. Basically the closer you move to an event that can be good or bad, the more volatile prices become. The further way you are the less volatile.
So the question becomes 'can you cope with short term fluctuations?'
If no, get out of the frying pan. If yes, then you know you're not really in a frying pan at all.
Fundamentals are unchanged. If not looking out on a much brighter view.
no tax if profit is with a 'fund of funds/shares'. Tax event is only on actual withdrawal of monies.
*without Reddit support (I never could type)
and just as equally -30%.
AMC is now at average 2019 levels, with more debt than then. So where does it go, with Reddit support?
It's fairly common for a dip to precede both results and a re-opening. The former is simply some investors taking profits, knowing a dip will also allow a lower buy back very soon. The re-opening is simply nerves re what all actually happen: film availability, footfall.
This will pass.
It's fixed at the 16:35 price (buy or sell).
Unless there is an 5 minute delay (which can happen multiple times).
Speaks for itself
If you're gambling, then don't trade. Period.
Risk-reward based on assessment of fundamentals and likely outcomes with money you can afford to risk.
Based on this, CINE is probably a very good stock to have in your portfolio.
The number of quality recovery stocks is dwindling VERY fast. In a few months most stocks with be showing minimal day to day fluctuations and make day trading expensive and the prerogative of longer term holders.
CINE business case is strong. Look at pre-covid state of play. The only real question is if you believe cinema as an industry will open this year.
I suggest this is a no-brainer. Throwing away 85%+ just because it's no longer 800%+ is not exactly rational.
Someone said you can only pay into 1 s&s isa per tax year. This is only true for new ISA money.
If you have another Isa (from a prior tax year) (s&s, cash, innovative finance) you CAN transfer between them to your hears content.
ISA 20k limit ONLY refers to investment into the ISA. Growth is never taxed.