Member Info for QueenElvis

I hope to make some money here too. I am leaving barc though for the minute. My husband has done well with it recently but I'm not keen on the rights issue thing but I'll check what the score is there tomorrow.

So you've definitely changed your mind then about you not going to be one of those posters who hangs around a share bb after they have sold up. Your decison. If you are one of the posters who Paul Stomach describes as a leopard who has changed his spots then fair enough. If however you are bitter about your loss then that's sad.

I did not say to i Leman that his or her posts on here were repetitive. That was you. You said that Ivornomoney was being pilloried for selling up here. That was not true. Ivornomoney has over 140 posts on this bb in the past month and was one of the biggest rampers of this share going - even by his own admission - until he sold. All fact. Now good evening to you sir but I would suggest you calm yourself down.

Far too hypersensitive. That post is full of false assumptions. I merely pointed out to you that different people have different strategies about when to buy and when to sell and observed that you had the opportunity to sell these at a profit. There is no need to get touchy or personal.

Hello there. Haven't seen you on the bb before today. Didn't the programme interview former employees of other companies but nobody from cupid. Cupid is maintaining that it is doing all it can to root out scammers which is an acknowledged problem throughout the industry but that does not make cupid guilty of wrong doing and to suggest otherwise is impugning the reputation of the auditors. I guess you must have a short position here or want to buy this share in spite of all your concerns otherwise you wouldn't be here. I have watched lots of shares being attacked on these bbs by folk who are very stealthy about their intentions but they want to know everybody else's intentions.. All I'll say to you bud is that I am keeping an eye on this because I want to buy some. Keep up the good work the morra as we say in Scotland.

Well yes I do see what you mean about the BBC but let's not get paranoid as cup weren't singled out for treatment. Like you say the industry wide problem with scamming was highlighted in the programme.

Yes or another way of putting it might be that you waited for good news i.e. the audit outcome to buy in and you were in the fortunate position of being able to sell at a profit shortly thereafter when the disposal news pushed the price even higher but some buyers don't buy on those sort o good news days e.g. Buffet. This time round you''re hoping to buy back in following bad news when the share is low. That might present you with another early opportunity to take a profit here and make up for the first time when you passed up on the opportunity. Good night.

Well that's true that people usually keep their eye on the daily price of any shares they hold. I looked in whilst on holiday the day the disposal rns came out and the next day when the price was 88p and the bb was receiving very optimistic posts back then whereas they are a bit pessimistic now and some might say unbalanced.

The investment community have been fully aware of the programme since Thursday night. What you are talking about is the viewing figures from a public who may not be invested in any shares but who might use dating sites but you'll stay with a product if you personally are not experiencing any trouble with it. Hard to gauge whether it would deter future customers - some might try it out for the first time to see for themselves. A lot of the English population have jetted off abroad at this time of year during this particular fortnight and those at home will be making the most of the weather with barbecues and al fresco dining and the like. I am not sure why the reporters had to organise fake profiles for there story. I thought they could have based a story by looking solely at existing customer accounts if they had any dissatisfied customers willing to participate in an investigation. Golfergold if your reading. The Scottish schools have been on holiday from school since the end of June so I'm actually at the half way point and we're coping quite well in the heat.

I'm not use to typing outdoors on this device but as long as the content is factual that's the main thing.

Wrong. First screened Thursday night. Can you please keep your posts accurate.

First mention was in Scottish news on Thursday night at 6.30 p.m followed by the screening of the programme at 7.00 pm that night. It has also been available via the iplayer to folk in investment circles and posted up numerous times on the bbs perhaps by people trying to infer that there is a serial rather than one programme. Whatever. If you've been fooled by anybody posting on this bb in the past then you're going to be extremely wary of them in their recarnated forms. Th born again Christians if you like who have seen the light like Billy Graham.

Depends of what other news is around. If I were Dobbie, and I'm not, I would seriously thing about buying back the company. It's being kicked about like a football to make money for traders whilst it's a listed company and it's receiving more than its fair of the treatment from the dirty den characters.

as enrc at the moment. Smart money this week has been on other metal companies with much calmer bbs and posters lol than the kaz one.

You've missed the point. The analogy I was trying to make was that when some of us see a need for change whether that's for the Takeover Panel's rules to be rewritten/shortened made more intelligible for readers, for breaches of the Disclosure and Transparency Regulations to be investigated and punished etc. etc. then we have a right to contact our MPs or do whatever we please within the law to get matters addressed without some posters on here commenting that we are wasting our time. The Suffragettes, of course, had a more pressing case and had to break the law in order to force a change in the law. As for principles, we all have our own moral code to live by. I personally wouldn't invest in tobacco companies but I would invest in companies which make certain alcohols. Cameron's visit to Kazakhstan included bringing up human rights issues which has actually opened up my eyes to the government's track record. As Ant said, most of us will recover in a matter of weeks from any hit we take with enrc or kaz holdings but what about any folk from that country who have invested - will they recover from their government and a few oligarchs relieving them of their life savings for their own benefit for a song and I understand there are fears about huge job losses. Good luck with your kaz shares but I'm holding mine only until I see what happens here. No doubt you'll be able to have long chats with Seifert and the like about corruption and all the rest on the kaz bb because I gather a few posters think it might extend beyond enrc. Seifert's viewpoint on the subject might well alter depending of whether or not he is shorting or invested at the time ATB

Look I have done okay with enrc but I am holding kaz shares and really don't think there is anything to stop that company being taken out with a similar low ball offer. There is nobody taking anything here personally. We are looking at general principles here. There seems to be a lot of common ground right at the moment between holders of this share and the likes of Vlad Lenin who I assume is shorting. You are the one who is out on a limb here and wanting to curb free speech on a matter which most folk want to air. Now have a good evening all, I'm away to watch the tennis.

I never asked you for any price predictions here resulting from any offer from this consortium. You volunteered them. I usually take as much notice of price predictions on these bbs as I do of the ad for the kaz horsemilk. You sure that's not you starring in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_92NOFg2Aco

scandal http://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/2013/06/27/shares/news-and-analysis/questions-for-authorities-in-enrc-scandal-kXcZQ8iDPuqt14xs4wTiQL/article.html Just a reminder of this article. alias these are questions the investment community in general are asking i.e. you don't need to be invested in enrc to have an interest in such matters or, as you put it, feel bitter about such matters??? Knowing when you began contributing to this bb, I am astounded that you find yourself in a loss position here given that you sold some at £3.00 on or before 17 May when you were only two minutes behind the boys on FT Alphaville in reporting that they thought the bid would come in at £3.40 only for them to apologise later in the day when it was announced that a tentative bid had been made which was thought to "materially undervalue the company" I am sure investors here will take comfort in learning that even the likes of you dropped a couple of eggs here but will be relieved that your basket is not ruined and that you have a balanced investment strategy but only post on 2 bbs on the lse. Well done you but we are not all durbys who you can bully off these bbs.

I read a post on another bb of another mining company this week. A poster was down £100,000 and you could say that that poster has only his or her self to blame for that but the bb in question suffers like many others from posters who boast about their buys and make very optimistic price predictions. Nothing wrong in doing that but I would contend that such posters then have a duty to post when they are selling and they should do so at the time of the sale and on the appropriate bb otherwise they simply become a laughing stock among the majority of other members of the posting community and they deserve the derision that comes their way from other posters. With regard to yourself, you were on this bb saying that an offer would come in for £3.70 or more yet it emerged later( i.e. after the indicative offer details became known) that you had sold tranches of shares well below that price when you were making those £3.70 predictions presumably with the intention of influencing others to buy at prices up to that level. Some would call you a pumper dumper. You didn't curb yourself thereafter and were telling us that you would be a very happy trader if the offer was £3.20. Do you not accept that having got your predictions terribly wrong once, you had a bit of a cheek to be on here again quoting inflated prices and raising the expectations on the inexperienced investor. FWIW, I have been trading enrc this year and it has been a lot kinder to me than kaz which I "invested" in this year. I have never made price predictions of any kind nor issued any buy or sell recommendations to other posters - I wouldn't dream of doing that - and I merely post and comment on news issues and offer a bit of banter and support to fellow shareholders. So the Investor's Chronicle and numerous other publications, Ant 1986 and I are all viewing the UK regulatory bodies askance but you think people are wasting their time taking these matters up with MPs and whoever. You might be right but some of us are willing to give it a go regardless of how futile you think the gesture might be. Cripes women would never have got the vote if the Suffragettes hadn't chained themselves to railings and thrown themselves under the King's horse at the Derby etc. etc. Don't assume that everybody is as apathetic as yourself. Oh and incidentally, it's not just issues surrounding Asian companies which concern me. I have proof of institutional investors breaching the Disclosure and Transparency Regulations in respect of companies based right here in the UK.

Ignore alias. The poster probably has a vested interest in the current cankered systems remaining unaltered. Too much transparency and stout regulations would probably hamper his or her progress and money making.