We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Good spot! I have no idea what that is though.
Q
Well, there's plainly gold in them thar hills. Good news.
Q
Juri Results (intercepts are reported as downhole width not true width)
BLACK HILLS
§ BHD001
§ 3.5m @1.88g/t from 226.5m^
§ Including 1.4m @3.49g/t Au
§ BHD002
§ 0.6m @2.56g/t Au from 273.5m
§ Including (72ppm Bi, 20ppm Te)
§ BHD003
§ 7.9m @ 0.16g/t Au from 157m
§ incl. 1m @ 51ppm As
§ 6m @ 0.14g/t Au from 178m
§ 7.85m @ 0.18g/t Au from 191.15m
§ incl. 0.9m @ 24ppm Bi; 4.9m @ 26ppm As
§ 7.3m @ 0.13g/t Au from 208m;
PATERSON RANGE EAST
§ GLD001A
§ 1m @1.49g/t Au from 651m^
^previously reported
I have just been looking at the geoview website.
That westernmost hole of the neighbours isn't only very close to Havieron, it's just as close to Scallywag - which is 100% ours.
Those results will be very interesting when they come.
Q
He did say that. Hopefully we'll get news this week.
Q
Looks like they've found stuff to make a nice worktop.
Q
I have just been looking at the satellite pictures from March and April 2020. What a distance we have come since then, in more ways than one.
Q
Interesting. How will they use that money, we wonder.
Q
I went back to December 2019 and saw no radar responses until yesterday's. Annoyingly the daylight image today is cloudy.
Q
On yesterday's radar image there are some interesting responses. There's one in the SW of Havieron next to the evaporation pond: probably a production bore (it's on a drawing). In the NW there's a response which doesn't correspond to anything I've seen on a drawing.
https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/eo-browser/?zoom=14&lat=-21.70213&lng=122.62445&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fservices.sentinel-hub.com%2Fogc%2Fwms%2Ff2068f4f-3c75-42cf-84a1-42948340a846&datasetId=S1_AWS_IW_VVVH&fromTime=2021-12-10T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2021-12-10T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=7_SAR-URBAN
Ah. I have checked the drawing. I was thinking of emulsion storage.
Sorry. I'll get my coat.
Q
It's labelled as such on a drawing: but it is to do with the actual mine, not the decline.
Q
The paste plant is the feature W of the explosives magazine.
Unless you mean some other sort of paste. I am no expert.
Q
I spent some time today staring into the blackness of the other tenements. Didn't see anything!
Q
I have looked at Tengraph, yes. I think as soon as that corridor is approved they'll cut a new road across. It'll be an easy spot on the satellite!
There is, as you say, a radar signal in the E. A square mark is visible on the daylight images more or less from the beginning of the month.
Q
Having roamed Geoview, Minedex and so-on, I can't find a timescale for tenements moving from Pending to Live. I was idly wondering about L45/636, which is the road and service corridor.
Anyone know anything?
Q
So! The feature I thought was a relocated explosives magazine is emulsion storage. Good to have new information. The mine appears definite now.
Q
Am I right in thinking the next set of drilling results will come on the evening of the 8th of December, or is it the week after?
I hope we don't get 120.4m @ 10.0g/t Au & 0.66% Cu again. It'd probably sink us.
Q
Dodge, I agree that there should be a reason for the change of tack. I hope SD will explain.
I expect he will. He has been improving as a communicator. Not a good week though.
Q
I also think some kind of tieup with Artemis is inevitable. The Havieron system is plainly bigger than the little square of the Havieron tenement.
Q
It occurs to me also that if my hypothesis is right then the agreement to keep a drill on Havieron instead of moving it to Juri (was it?) because it was going through some interesting stuff might have been less amicable than it was presented.
The placing does at least give a good amount to work with.
SD (I boringly repeat) needs to explain.
Q