Member Info for pomander

This probably a more relevant article - https://www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/rdf-exporter-secures-uk-order-from-cogen/ This highlights the competition and the need for scale. Should also give you an idea on timeframes- 12-18 months to have anything commercal up and running looks very testing to me. I also don't get a business model of even a 25Tonne unit sited on a huge EfW site.

I seem to recall that KA said they wre looking at 5 potential sites- Peel website is worth taking a look at, don't know how up to date it is but seems not much happening at many of their sites currently, although the company is profitable, most of that is derived from upwards revaluations of its property holdings. Somewhat ironically Peel's auditors are Deloitte's ! Sacked by KA for being incompetent !

Aussie is just so yesterday- they tried, but did not conquer and left with their tail between their legs.

Jabber is telling porky pies again. He has clearly had no contact with KA. His facts are all wrong and the auditors resigned, they were not were not removed from office. Deloittes would be interested in the view of their services being disseminated by KA and posted onto public Bulletin Boards. KA should also also be reminded that the directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. KA could not even get his own company's name spelt right in the last RNS, no wonder Deloittes had enough, they were paid a very modest fee for the work performed. I would not be surprised if going concern issues are back on the horizon now that Hillgrove has run for cover. KA's work is strewn with errors, the recent presentation update could be torn to pieces if one had the desire to do so , which I don't.

blt2- about time you showed a little respect. This is an important development and without Dolphin I suspect the likes of you and many others would be in the dark.

Tetolite- to have a G� at every station means having waste mountains at every station to gasify - is that what you want to turn the country into. When is the penny going to drop.

looks that way, although one would expect a number of investors to buy well ahead of that. There were no sales post the UK launch ? UK is a Recoirdati territory.

Crat- so you seem to be suggesting these are trades driven by leaked insider information !

Piltick All very well, except gasification has always failed miserably - as per following from which I have also posted a small extract http://www.ukwin.org.uk/files/pdf/UKWIN_Gasification_Failures_Briefing.pdf Promoters of gasification and pyrolysis schemes, sometimes collectively called "Advanced Thermal Treatment" schemes, regularly make bold claims about the technological, environmental and financial performance of their proposed facilities with a mixed waste feedstock. In reality, where such configurations have been attempted they have either failed to live up to these claims or operators remain suspiciously quiet about reporting actual performance. Because companies do not like to talk about their failures it is often hard to find out what went wrong. For example, Air Products remain tight-lipped about the serious high-profile problems they encountered at Tees Valley. Gasification and pyrolysis constitute some of the riskiest technologies in the waste industry and are synonymous with bankruptcies, failures and broken promises. This perception is well deserved, with the lack of examples of success starkly contrasting with a litany of failures. Piltick, you are speculating on Pyromex which is no use to anyone. What we do know is that is was scrapped because potential customers were unhappy with its performamnce and this was also hidden from shareholders with KA continuing to 'big it up' whilst at the same time being aware of its shortcomings. Phe then ran off from Munich to Thailand and Australia but again fialed to sell a single unit. Why is Bond bailing and no insiders buying if all is as you beleive?

or a bid

Like Bignose, who know's but I suspect not - in any event I am not sure that repeating the launch announcement on a country by country basis will have any impact whatsoever on the share price given the reaction of the last two days. Just 9 m traded yesterday, even allowing for the Chinese New Year, this is very difficult to fathom. Post UK launch we went 546 m , 609 m, 250 m in first three days. That's more than the free float. Given recent events looks more and more like the liquidity for Maven to sell into must have been provded by a stakebuilder who put a strong bid on teh table. Free float is circa 1.3 billion, so is it conceivable that someone picked up circa billion shares and then reamining 300 m were churned by traders? I might be cluctching at straws and maybe I just don't understand the workings of the HK market.

Piltick - that's your weakness in my humble opinion - so lets agree to differ and move on. I have made my point. Good luck to you Pltick.

Sharesport- for someone as smug as you are arew, perhaps you would like to explain why the share price has collapsed and in spite of your endless posts on the burgeoning hydrogen economy. As for Chinese Fuels cells, I suggest you do your own research, there is a plethora of information publicly available on the internet. As for AFC- I will leave it to you to join up the dots between, Phe, KA, Waste2tricity, AFC Energy, Yady Worlwide, Adam Bond, Howard White, Peel Enviromental. Any astsute investor should be concerned about the picture those dots create, but in your case I very much doubt it, because your only focus is on being childishly rude to anyone who posts a view that you do not share. What I find so hypocritoical about the likes of you is when I said Bond was cashing out, which incidenetally has now been proven to be spot on, I was met with counter cliams that he was fully committed, locked in for 12 months and would retain an equity stake beyond that. Instead he trousered a couple of millon, and dumped everything at the first opportunity. Hardly a positive sign.

Not at all Rossanan and bumble you must start looking more closely at the facts, the announcement is suitably worded to leave the door wide open to extend the arrangement. I don�t really understand your point because if there is no successful project development there are de facto no profits to share, indeed there is no business, its brown bread. The arrangement does not suddenly expire and allow Phe to walk away into the sunset and from its obligations. In any event, let�s be pragmatics, KA is on both boards ! Hope he has sound D&O cover. PowerHouse is pleased to announce that it has entered into a Cooperation Agreement (�the Agreement�) to appoint Waste2tricity plc (Waste2Tricity) as its Project Development Consultant on an �� initial�� 24 month contract. The contract may be ��extended�� if development milestones are met and is subject to cancellation with a 90 day notice period The terms of the contract are such that Waste2tricity will ��initially�� be compensated in PowerHouse shares for its fees of �20,000 per month to be issued on a monthly basis. ��Subsequent�� to successful project development, and after each party recovers its project-related costs (including PoweHouse recovering the expense of the shares issued,) the profits of the project will be shared 50/50.

It is a sound argument that the launch, or a large part thereof, was already in the price. Howver that was also true about the UK launch and that launch was for a single territory with no marketing campaign, no money changing hands and for the wrong size tin! The significance was the protection of the EMA approval- I don't beleive Chinese investors/gamblers as they have been labelled would have been aware of that, but for a potential suitor it would be absolutely critical. There was massive liquidity immediately at the next days market opening, which Maven were effortlessly able to sell a 6.5% stake into without any depression of teh SP. It looks to me that a stakeholder was keen to buy all it could get and bid up the price which got the attention of the gamblers who then joined the party over the next couple of weeks with 3 billion shares traded. The disconnect between the UK launch and EU launch share price action is just too great in my book for there not be a good reason behind it. I also note there was no siginificant incearse in volumes ahead of both launches, easliy explained for UK if a suitor in play, but not so for the EU launch. Would be nice to get an experienced HK brokers take on this.

Bignose - Was being sarcastic on the Italian bit! Hardly a big call. Just 30 m volume 4 am - interesting.

I will pass on trawling your old posts- and you were doing so well until your final sentence, although I don't anticipate being around in three years.

Spot On Alq - well done on Italy, although in fairness that was your second attempt - seem to recall Germany was your initial stab Your the claim that they would wait for patienet feedback before rolling out, was a bit of a gaffe though. I was confused by the wording on the announcement, but I think reasonable to assume supplying the wholesalers will result in at least one sale to the end user, so taken as a given for the purposes of triggering the �4m. I understand the delays to market, but that is not so important to me with my investors hat on. In any event I would not be surprised if sales picked up pretty quickly given the awareness and the lack of any approved treatment ex the hugely inferior SSRI's.

I don't think so KB- I think Alq got into his head. He is over UKOG these days !!!!

I suspect the only reason for another paid for research note is to try and ramp up the SP safely above 0.5p because right now they cannot issue any further shares. Cash must be running low. Wasn't something meant to happen in early 2018 & what happened to the AFC fuel cell that was to be delivered by now ?