Member Info for Plappers

Yes - but that was different SUNNERS - i’m not taking about the initial NDA - needs must on that occasion - i’m talking about subsequent arrangements post walking. In the board room - mid Winter Newmont: we’ve walked AS THERE’s alot to be done here GH: ok (b’stards) Newmont: but how about we sign another NDA to say that if we do strike it big you get 1st refusal? GH: erm let me thank about that. Newmont: (Taps fingers on desk) GH: sod off

Hmm - but would GH have signed off on that as part of the initial NDA - limiting onesself to a single partner at such an early stage would be idiotic.

Berk - it’s rhyming slang for the Berkshire Hunt. Almost all of the prats on here ever prattle on about is hearsay, hunches and hocum. There’s barely ever any substance to anything posted here. Its always stated with such conviction but its just crap 99pc of the time.

Held back by the eye of the storm? - what the dickens are you going on about.. Berk!

Muse somewhere else please gibbon - this is the world's most pointless point.

Agree with the sentiment here but 35p says this dribbles back 1-2% by the EOTW.

What a pointless post.

As predicted by the scrumptious Candles one hastens to add....

Or any other day of the week in your case hombre....

ha - that's hopeful - I think thinks are far more likely to be Christmas, perhaps well into next year before that comes forth.

Depends on the precise definition of Autumn, by some measures Autumn starts on Sept 1.

crook!

This share does not 7am... it’s typically a late riser...

My comments on this last post - not an attempt to DR BTW but perhaps an opinion on what we know right now.

I would assess this as per my comments below.

1 – Tonnage - 650,000 tons Havieron potential estimated (bit of a guess but fairly sensible.)
2 – Grades must be good quality - exceptional grades (some nice numbers so far that's for sure)
3 – Allows the mining process to be relatively standard - standard extraction foreseen (!!!!speculative - all manner of pitfalls are possible!!!!)
4 – Low cost extraction or potential to be so in time - assumed possible (!!!!speculative - who knows!!!!)
5 - Long life of the mine for sustained output - assumed possible - TBC
6 – Lots of upside – assumed possible - TBC
7- Stable and secure jurisdiction - In safe Australia and no local communities in area
8 – When a major develops a prospect its has to be attractive for others to have or procure - (!!!!speculative!!!!)

I'd say that's 2 out of 8 ticks and I didn't really understand Q8.

My own view is that EG will come good - you say they have amazing tech, but they embraced this and decided not to invest. Explain why?

then...

Yet again I await positive result which i feel must be due any time now - EXPLAIN WHY?

This is simply gut feel based on hope rather than anything of substance. All very well calling people childish but this post is just annoying and pointless as there is no substance just opinion and foolish hope.

Say what you like about readthecandles - he has called things right so far ...

Explain please - how can this be "flagship" and "leftfield" all at the same time?

Pointless speculation...

I'll chuck 3 shore in.

That doesn’t explain what bedrock nor reefs actually are - until you are able to explain this to me in the context of these prospects then i dont believe you know what on earth you are investing in.

Might be bad news...