Member Info for PL75

Cheery bunch today aren't you?

The same could be said of vaccines and the ignorant reaction of the great unwashed. They don't stop you carrying or spreading it and they don't offer 100% protection, yet the interview I've just heard on the radio was with someone that's been shielding since March and is talking about how wonderful it will be to hug and kiss people. Yes, wonderful.

Mina has been correct when they've been bickering over the numbers, the Innova test is a useful test - every person found is someone isolating that wouldn't have as it does pick up high viral loads. Deeks has been correct when he's said their usage has been abused as they're not a diagnostic and shouldn't be treated as such - they're about finding positive cases for isolation, not negatives.

Reeks of them doesn’t it? It was a decent realistic update, you don’t just plug in commercial equipment like a toaster. Good news on certification too, one more tick in the box to go. Lots of interest sounds good too. I’ve added. Again. Keep saying I’m not adding more, but despite share price wobbles and the stench on here it’s difficult to resist.

Same story, couldn’t trade until it moved up. Usual MM stuff. Happy to buy more, all proceeding well

Revolutionary idea

Of course he ******* is, the daft **** keeps swearing

I’m sure Doh is looking in. Devastated he can’t be here to enjoy this with us

ODX - BUILD IT AND THEY’LL ACTIVELY RUN AWAY........

Plenty ODX capacity available for Awacta’s test :-)

I’d say so muck

Btw, if you take the performance percentages and apply them to the number of tests performed by innova by category you get 161/197 82% so the best performing. Promising...

It’s not an even distribution Timster, so whilst they give an overall, it’s a bit meaningless. In fact it’s skewed unfairly against the company that shall not be named

I noticed that muck, bit of a mixed bag. It suggested decent performance at lower viral loads.

I mean, I’m saying maybe, but probably not

Maybe, but WaffAl is particularly shy. Wondering if they didn’t want them published as they’re only comparable with Innova. Then the debacle over the sample method and the switch which does appear to be govt led. Saliva was the original preference but the tender docs now score an AN sample highest.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.13.21249563v1.full.pdf

Mina is singing its praises...

https://mobile.twitter.com/michaelmina_lab/status/1350766538995994624

Btw.... who is the manufacturer of LFD x who had not given consent to be named? (Line 176) A saliva based LFD maybe?

Who knows, adeptrix are officially the manufacturer so that validation might be a different one. Also might be MAP. It’s all guesswork, why would you want another RNS as it would only add to the confusion - things are never clearer. Maybe WaffAl is a reincarnation of Agatha Christie. Every piece of prose from him is a mystery.

Why bother with trials if you’re just going to ignore them and the manufacturer? Utterly bonkers. Pure guesswork from here on in. Enjoy the summer as we’ll be back in lockdown later in the year, possibly due to mutated versions.

That’s affirmative, it’s wot WaffAl wood want

*not necessarily

C’mon, get it write...

Here, here