We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
I still don’t get it how people can get the appointment as a negative. The chap has been an insider for a few months, Interim for a few weeks. If the ship was sinking he would have not accepted the job, would you? YEEEESSSSSSSS SIREEEEEEE (is that how it is done?)
Theo I tend to judge CEO actions in the long term, you might dispute what that is, but defo not the first hour trading day of his appointment. This share price is being manipulated, I thought we all agreed on that. I have seen this in Tesla for months. Came good on that, it will on this one too. CEO adds value by taking action to make the company grow, and as a consequence, the sp will go north accordingly.
Guys of the many theories heard on this bb the least plausible is the right issue. Which one of you shareholder would subscribe if offered? Diluition would be crazy. The bank doesn’t need money from a risk and regulatory perspective. The stock price is depressed for a number of reason but not lack of capital. IMHO
Cud look at the number of news... interest will spark more interest... I don’t see 160 happening.. if it does I will short myself because that would spin the sp to zero but as I said i don’t see it happening unless some other chit comes out
Theo the CEO has no impact on the stock price of the company he manages? I am going to have to disagree on this one. And ref to the div, no ones expect that from a company at this stage of growth. Said that, after refinancing the MREL the company is in profit, as simple as that.
Theo why would he not? His performance will be most likely related to value added and share price.. he joined the company, he took the ceo job, he must somehow believe in the company and in himself. Do not let your bias judge other people actions. IMHO