Member Info for pijoe1212

thank you agadem for listening ....for once

we could always meet on the udog bb when the *hit hits the fan..LOL seriously..i posted this morning on reading the RNS (UM..10:17)... then re-read several times ..then made a call..then posted 11:10....

MT..some 15 months back i caped the price of a share...i was 60% of the sales that day (over 175,000 shares at 36p average)..i am fully aware how one or a small number of pi's can move the SP.. but savp is not in that scale of trading and co..it is far larger..i or you will not set or move this sp

sorry if it sounded like i was picking on you. i was not..just using your posting as an example. but i stand by the thrust of my argument..paid posters have encouraged regular posters on this BB to post in a way i have not encountered previously..even on the uber ramper Ukog BB. i think you know i will and do take companies to task if they mislead the market (i note today i did not get a mention in the MSMN AGM statement (unlike last year))

MT this is not an illiquid stock.. and has not been.. of course until it was suspended.

MT i 100% agree with small iliquid aim co's ..not £100M pound aim cos (as this was) with trade levels of the historic norm for savp....(by the way i know of two aim oilers at Mcap £100M who want more PI's to increase liquidity)

juste well that is at least three honest peeps on here (ADUK is honest and true to his word)..jim is also very consistent and clear and logical (and in my view honest)

MT you fundamentally miss the point. the % of PI and II holders who read this BB is very small. it should be a vehicle for PI's who wish to be informed increasing knowledge. posts on here have (in the main) little effect on the sp (but can make individual readers loose money, which is why i so strongly object to ramping). so a long holder who posts dissatisfaction is being honest and helping fellow investors. dissatisfied holders posting uber positive views while selling or planning to sell are the real *rseholes. it is sod all to do with shorts.

i can not recall any LSE BB so invested with such a high % of paid posters and fundamentally rude posters (who are simply following the lead of paid posters). it is truly appalling. i see for example posters such as tidd, who is rather enthusiastic and has been for the number of years i have known him about any share he takes a position in post in a way which is out of character. as for some of the others who have never posted on any other BB and have registration dates on LSE at or very close to the CMD..

this talk about Malcy does amuse me greatly..how do you think he earns part of his income?

you are also too rude for your own good.. but in your case simply down to being 5 cylinders short of a V8 on the Eq and IQ measures of normality

ninja started today..ready to blow the frustration out in the morning

pls stop being so rude to all and sundry.. your paymaster is not pleased about your recent posting

before i read the recent posts.. if the placing price is below the range (40p to 50p) and there is no open offer...just what will the uber bulls think? i know what i would think and it rymes with anchors...

juste....that is funny. not sure you meant it to be.

by the way..i think it costs about $1200pa ...

olivier put his side kick on it...?

they have a two year option over 60M at placing price....in the RNS

juste the insulters & plants on here make this BB largely a waste of time and space. one of the worst examples of LSE BB's in my view. anyone who is not uber positive is a "shorter"...what a joke

having read it again and thought about what it says and why it may say it, i am negative on the latest news. but the placing price remains key in the short term.