Member Info for Phimx

Mickeydj:

Admittedly Gardin had a decent spell of papers in the nineties it appears he has written virtually nothing since 2006. This not surprising given his involvement with over 50 companies, at least, in various business ventures. To describe himself as prominent in the field of theoretic physics is a huge ask. But being generous I could discuss what prominent actual means and what is required to be prominent !

Mickeydj: From Clear Leisure RNS 31 July 2015

During the last twenty years, he has been Director of almost fifty companies in Italy, UK, USA, Israel,

Hong Kong, China, Singapore, Mauritius and Jersey.

Since 1984 to 2014, he has been Research Associate Professor at Udine, Milano and Siena University

lecturing Artificial Intelligence, Theory and Application of Computation, and Virtual Reality. His academic papers include more than 50 individual and joint publications and three books on the subject

of Artificial Intelligence 𝗮𝘀 𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿.

Mickeydj:

𝗡𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗧𝗢𝗥 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀

https://www.amazon.com.au/Computational-Intelligence-International-Conference-Proceedings/dp/0444891188

I'll throw out another challenge for this statement

" with influential papers cited widely in the scientific community."

Can anyone name an influential paper written by Gardin that has been widely cited in the scientific community ?????

AND I did ask the question a while ago.

Can anyone name the books Gardin has authored. Before we get into a meaningless debate as to whether authoring is the same as writing a book. I'm sure the vast majority who read this will understand that the author of a book is nearly always the writer.

Daffypicker:

I assume.e Gardin wrote that, it seems very impressive, if only you could point me in the direction of his papers on theoretical physics? His academic ouput is not impressive. Believe what you will but the evidence to support my words are out there if you care to look. I don't believe the first things I read I go and check !

He has 𝗡𝗢𝗧 authored 3 books. He has edited conference papers, what defines a book I'm not sure. But I do know editing other people's work isn't authoring books.

Using Meta AI. I typed in " professor Francsco Gardin's physics papers"

It replied " it seems you are looking for Professor Francesco Gardin's physics papers. However, I could not find any information on a physicist by that name.

So much for being renowned!!

I've listened to 2 or 3 Proactive interviews with Gardin and he seems to say essentially nothing of value and he certainly doesn't clarify things. It is obvious that they are scripted and he's fed leading questions. It's a show to impress, or not, gullible investors. trying to understand what is going on is not obvious.

Usersteve:

See this for gaps in once values

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/adddja/the_weird_nonce_pattern/

Usersteve:

Most excellent writeup of the the Bitmain Nonce voids. FPGA/ASIC are perfected for parallel operation.

Usersteve: Also

" This strongly suggests that the method that QBT think they have discovered are actually optimisations that already are available in even the simplest chip design software tool."

FPGA design tool Vivado is available to hobbyists, FPGAs are becoming mainstream now. Vivado essentially converts a HDL software like hardware programming language into physical hardware within the FPGA. It's got a way to go before it can say " you don't want this circuit you really need this optimised circuit I've created " !! Perhaps one day soo that will come.

ASIC design is a different ball game Skywater and Openlane are bringing slow ASICs down to the little man but 12 and 7nm technology is not available at this time unless you have serious money.

Again this was something Gardin didn't seem to realise initially as he waffled on about creating a QBT ASIC which wS strange for a man employing FPGA/ASIC experts to think for him.

Usersteve: You posted

" At 8:34 Gardin says "Our FPGA/ASIC designers kept saying 'OK this is a very smart improvement, but the simplest tool will do it automatically'. But we filed two patents anyway."

This could mean anything you want, it's Gardin Garbage. He could be referring to the FPGA tool probably Vivado by Xilinx or he could be referring to the simulation tool. Either way they are not Bitcoin mining optimisation tools.

SHA256 speedup optimisations appeared almost immediately after it wasreleased. As I've said a number of times ASIC Ultraboost patent has been rejected. Both Gardin and his patent agent must have been fully aware it was prior knowledge from Naik's thesis.

DelbertGrady:

Looking through 80 papers Pizzi has authored or coauthored I cannot find a collaboration with Gardin.

He describes himself a renowned physicist but appears to have no physics papers accredited to him. Nothing like blowing your own trumpet!

Usersteve:

Experience has taught me that never ending projects may chop and change at a whim. Changing the plot to manufacturing their own ASIC is very feasible, whether it would have any commercial value is a new story. Its simply about the placings. There are many examples on AIM to choose from: UKOG, INSP, VAL they've been going years without revenue or any substantial product or service. It's an awesome line of work.

£5,350, As I said a small investment.

Now worth a lot less. Even less shortly as Gardin fires up the ASIC story again and comes asking for more money

No surprise this morning Mickeydj has worked hard and most of yesterday's posts removed.

This included the claim he made

"Phimx, my 'small' investment as you put it, is probably a considerable size more than your house is worth"

I pointed out the average UK house price was £269,000 and posted a reminder of his own post from 5 Feb 2022

" These support levels that have also been previous resistance levels have been visited many many times before.

In my opinion you will find lots of buyers in the 0.945 to 0.750 zone. I am a HOLD with 508000 shares at an average of 1.053 and i will be topping up at these levels myself, if it drops to the lower support levels i noted above.

I expect selling resistance at 1.400 and 2.272, but am holding for a longer term above 6.000. I am pretty sure GSA Capital, which is one of London’s best known hedge funds, have become private recently, and am not surprised to see them with a short position amongst the many others they have."

𝗜 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗲 𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗱

Tyke68:

Wasn't revenue last year ?

Or was it just more drivel from Foggy ?

Alans55:

Positivity or negativity are irrelevant the only thing that counts for anything is the reality of QBT's project and that's what we are here to discuss.

Dooogle:

If there is inside information that could impact the share price then it must be disclosed to the market as soon as possible.

Everything which has been disclosed can be freely disclosed to anyone. After all what does Gardin talk about at the US shows or does he walk around gagged. He seems able to talk in Proactive Investor interviews, perhaps those are fakes!?

You have some strange concepts regarding insider information and closed periods.

Dooogle: You posted

" ... Jose has also joined QBT officially, now I would much rather take his view over any poster on an anonymous BB who has ulterior motives as their history proves."

Remind us of what Rios's view is because he seems reluctant to make any mention of QBT - anywhere!

He's a strategic advisor, he lends his name to the company for a fee! I wonder what advice he can give that a team of world class experts, professors and Ph.d. cannot?