Member Info for Phimx

I don't see my buy at 11:53 ?

No problem buying 10,000 at time 11:53

I think there may be a hint of forward Selling going on here. Perhaps in preparation for Gardin announcing he needs more money to commercialise the Methods or to return the development of a QBT ASIC.

Still no hint of revenue promised last year, how was that supposed to be created ? Obviously that projection was simply candy to sweeten investors hopes or just another plain old gimmick.

Gardin writes

" This closed-door format allows us to go deeper and deliver tailored insights to those we believe can truly benefit from what we have developed.”

Hang on a minute Foggy you haven't released any videos you said you were going to make so that people could understand what QBT were trying to achieve. How do you expect these people to understand your insights without first watching a few of your amateurish cartoons?

Oldsharedog: You posted

" You can read the RNss in either a positive or negative way but not in an ambiguous way."

Gosh that's baffling!

Oldsharedog:

I don't dispute its your choice but come on - 5p for such Millionaire making technology, do I detect your faith isn't that strong ?

Oldsharedog:

5p !!

You'll be here a while then ?

Oldsharedog:

I think you'll find all the information you need on the seed packet, it will recommend an amount per area. You can then deduce from simple maths the expected yield. You will need to deduct a factor for seeds that fail to germinate of course. Of course I'm assuming the grass variety only has a single blade per seed. I'm sure this could become a remarkably interesting topic but perhaps this is not the forum for it. Try and concentrate on the story at hand.

Santiago: You posted 25 Jan 2023

" mannnan why you asking Phimx don't you see that it's controlling the share price on this share ,he or she is talking facts only and when the share price is low enough hi jumps in and sell again higher without rumping it, CLEVER , Im watching tis guy for a while.... and buffalo is the same probably is the same persone..."

Had you only listened to the 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘀

How do you compare results of 2 identical systems, one having the Oracle and one not when according to Gardin

The reason for this approach is due to Bitcoin’s current level of mining difficulty; that is, the probability of finding a winning hash is statistically almost impossible, unless using hundreds of mining rigs simultaneously.

From RNS 15 Augusg 2024.

You would have to wait a lon long time to get a result, even from the Oracle system

Usersteve:

On this point I have to disagree. The demonstrations and attendance have preiously been announced in RNS. Therefore it is easily argued that this news is not price sensitive.

Where are the partners and customers who have been using SaaS for the last couple of years ??????

So Gardin still hawking his suitcase of wares round the shows. Where are the partners beating down the door to pour over QBT's mountain of rigorous lab results and then sign up QBT to an amazing deal ?????

It reads like more candy for the gullible to suck on. QBT are already supposed to be well down the beaten track with North American and Chinese players in the game. It seems he's running out of things to say and is rehashing what has gone before.

Candy at the end of a long stick!

Obelisk:

Well very handy indeed that will save money for a photo shoot with Jose and his mate. Gardin has to keep this story going to pick up his fees and wages. What about the company testing the Oracle they'll be miffed.

More progress on the NDAs at least.

Usersteve:

Excellent post. Why use Method C at all?

Usersteve:

NDAs aren't necessarily associated with a deal. I guess you could sign up the office window cleaner, to prevent him disclosing anything about your operations he may see.

Obelisk:

Simply reading through the posts available shows your claim to be untrue. When posts are deleted whole threads disappear both the ramping and deramping posts. I think Mickeydj could claim the title of head post deleterious.

DaffyPicker: You posted

" Perhaps that message should be directed at F Gardin??"

You could be right, its obvious since Brew left there are no posters here having any idea of SHA256, Bitcoin science or mathematics. I include myself.

Even Gardin has problems giving straight answers to anything !

Mickeydj: You posted

" Really !! Stop trying to deceive......,"

I'm not trying to deceive in the slightest, you have posted a link which appears to be AI generated evidence supposedly. Without doubt the 3 books claimed to have been written by Gardin are a collection of 'proceedings' written by others and edited into a 'book' collection by Gardin and other editors.

So the claim Gardin has written 3 books on artificial Intelligence is thoroughly misleading and absolutely factually incorrect.