Member Info for Phimx

Oldsharedog

You seem to be using that case directly, to pour scorn on Usersteve. That case wasn't the focus of his post but certainly is for yours. Its a pity your friends and family can't see your real soul and how you give it away for money.

Oldsharedog:

No, I don't expect Gardin to reply to posters here but I do expect him to respond with actions. He did exactly that when commissioning a decent video of Method C, although far too late. The childish animations were terrible and give a bad impression.

The current Web site is poorly presented and written, is this the face of world class technology does the man have no nous whatsoever?

Gardin seems incapable of presenting decent engineering or scientific results to shareholders and the wider world. His flip flop progress is detrimental to the share price and investor confidence.

I don't think I questioned your financial status but go ahead and talk about it anyway, you seem determined to do so.

Oldsharedog: You posted

" I have news for those ppl, no amount of speculation by bystanders will ever shift a companies direction to their intended destination.

I do hope that news lands fast to stop the guesswork, of both invested and non invested, so that QBT can continue their intended journey."

There is nothing stopping QBT continuing there intended journey. If Gardin has what he states then he could have countered the many criticisms and observations made by the derampers, he hasn't.

It seems strange that you, a staunch defender of QBT, will pull out at the earliest opportunity! Do you now not wish to become a millionaire or has the weight of evidence heaped too high to bury Gardin's claims ?

If you truly believed what you've been preaching you would not be selling out.

Scottwins: You post

" In the meantime someone is playing silly buggers with the SP"

At a guess I'd say that was the people selling!

Oldsharedog: You posted

" Phimx - INCORRECT - QBT know what those results were & they relay them to the market !!

Oldsharedog how do they relay the results to the market? Come to think of it who are the market? So are the results price sensitive information ?

How do you know this ?

Scottwins: You posted

"The results clearly showed that using QBT AI software resulted in producing more pool rewards per unit of time."

𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 no-one knows what those results were!!

Why is 0.5% being stated instead of 0.2% for shorting threshold ?

Oldsharedog: You posted

"maybe you could do a bit of double dutch - you seem quite good at that !!"

I became quite proficient after reading many of Gardin's RNS, they provide a master class

Oldsharedog:

Still here just pondering why Methods A and B now need to be implemented in ASICs

Scottwins: You posted incorrectly

" the same frustration seen in Phimx and referring to the CEO as propeller head."

Incorrect I have never called Gardin " propellor head" You imagined that !

Hexham:

I don't recall reading that one but I do tend to skip those RNS as being uninteresting. So the next thought if you want shares why would you wait to buy at 5p or 10p, buy recently sub 0.7p. Second thought perhaps they don't have money to buy because they aren't being paid!

If these experts know the truth and the Methods do really perform they will be buying at these low prices. Obviously if the share price was to rocket they could buy at a good profit at zero risk.

Scottwins: You post

" Ah so you mean every company that has a CEO is ruled by one man, lets forget about the other directors, the likes of Jose Rios who is employed by the company, the various others contractor, scientists, AI consultants, who have all put there soul into getting these methods working, while you poor scorn on for your own agenda."

Firstly Rios isn't an employee, there are only 4 employees and 3 are directors the other person must be Pizzi. Rios is an advisor. As for pouring scorn on others, I query if they actually exist and if they do how they are paid ?

Oldsharedog:

You are getting too excited. I did not have you in mind when posting why I thought some people would have so respect for my posts.

I was referring to myself and what I post versus the board in general

Hexam:

Off the top of my head I thought many options had expired a second time in May.

Asterisk2025: You post

"An alternative perspective is that their involvement in this project is not motivated by a salary, but by the prospect of greater potential returns"

You could be correct but you can't feed your family share certificates. The options some recieved proved worthless and I'm surprised they haven't been reissued. How do the 20 world class experts feed themselves?

Usersteve:

Not sure if I congratulated you on raising the excellent point about the PofW hashes and its affect on rewards.

Well done, you do provide some decent reading matter. Perhaps I need one of Gardin's Oracle's to filter out the mass of low entropy posts.

Oldsharedog:

I'm sure many people respect my ability to post lucidly and without resorting to name calling and insult.

Oldsharedog: You post

" Answer the question and gain some respect."

Why on earth should I waste my time detailing QBT's accounts. I stated that QBT gets through a lot of money, simply look at the annual loss if you don't believe that statement. Therefore my opinion is - another placing is underway. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 normally because the volume is low this will happen over several weeks.

Usersteve:

I doubt the other 2 directors are earning more than £40 k.

They are just figureheads in this company.

Usersteve:

Compare nurses wages in UK

£30,000 to £85,000 !!!