Member Info for Phimx

Mickeydj: You post

" I have also had my most recent questions answered in detail"

I dont remember anyone else having received replies from QBT but you want us to believe that you have no trouble. I don't believe you have received any detailed replies to anything. I don't think Gardin would be able to provide detailed replies to any searching questions for 2 reasons.

He has yet to provide any detailed information of worth on any subject.

Virtually all detail would be subject to: insider information, IP, NDA, commercial confidentiality.

Scottwins: You post

" Good grief, good job most know how trading agendas work is all I’m going to say."

Is that because you have no idea also?

Oldsharedog: You post

" I’m sure it will come back to bite you soon"

Better to show you're unafraid of the dog, it's bite is toothless!

Oldsharedog: You post

" I’ve always found that being prolific is better than being pathetic."

Congratulations, you've managed to achieve both with your recent posts.

Co

Probably what too much drink and too much time on your hands does for you!

RKB: You post

" ... I have been waiting over 9 years ..."

So what was it you invested in 9 years ago, what was the great investment opportunity you spotted ?

It certainly wasn't AI, quatum algorithms or methods to mine Bitcoin ?

Mickeydj:

Perhaps the 'cartel' is on the increase because there are more holders beginning to realise this is just another AIM string-along-another-hopeless-project and one man gets rich!

Of course there are a handful who have bet too much, they will sing its praises to the bitter end.

Scottwins: You post

"Wonder if some sells will turn up now to make it look like some have been spooked on this desperate backstory thats been cooked up."

I think most here think the 'backstory' is a lot more plausible than the 'frontstory'

Williwonti: You post

" Perhaps if it was legislated that listed companies had to issue regular reports it might help gain a little faith from PIs, obviously this would mean sometimes bad news having to be issued which would have a temporary detrimental effect on the SP but all companies would be in the same boat and it would be more transparent for us?"

Think you'll find rules are already in place for what you suggest. You need to do some study!

Oldsharedog: You post

" Shame you wouldn't be there having NO shares to qualify"

First rule of investing 'don't throw your money away' !!

In the name of openess and clarity all companies should allow an open day for shareholders or a shareholder's delegation to visit and view the company's operations.

I noted Gardin mentioned London and Milan in an interview, what happened to Frankfurt?

Plutuq:

I'll thank you for showing the initiative. I'm betting there are no satisfactory answers

Usersteve:

I would suggest there is a conflict with the aims of the mining pool and Methods A and B. Both methods work by suggesting a preferred portion of the available output space i.e. all possible output hashes where the golden hash may be. An alternatively way to consider the methods is they suggest a NONCE value of where to begin hashing in a preferred output portion based on the block information. But, when working in a mining pool each miner is allocated its own unique starting point, its starting NONCE so that the miners are not overlapping in the search space, which would defeat the purpose of being in a pool i.e. everyone searching the same portion. Perhaps methods A and B don’t want to search the portion indicated by the pool but somewhere else !

DelbertGrady: You post

" I've been invested since the CLP days and honestly believe that this company has developed something that works,"

That is exactly the point in question. I don't doubt they have something that works but it is the issue Gardin isn't clarifying I.e.exactly how well it works. The methods performance with reference to the latest Chinese miners determines if they are a success or not. Why is Gardin coy with that tiny detail ??

Mickeydj:

That reminds me, you posted

" ... Secondly, as you already know my investment is significantly more than 5k"

Now this is pure make-believe on your behalf, I have no idea how much you have invested in this. I note that you cannot even explain how you think I might know. You need to collect your thoughts and seperate the

truth from fiction.

Mickeydj: You post

" Look at the the interactions between Plutuq and Phimx in the four posts below."

Plutuq writes a message on the wrong board and then apologised for doing so. I don't see any connection with me there.

Yes he messaged about the weekend and I tongue in cheek thanked him. I thought that would get your conspiracy hackles up. But as for proving anything I think you fooling yourself. Presumably you're filing all this away to expose everyone when you contact the FCA.

Plutuq:

Thanks

Scottwins: You post

" They are a danger to PI as they spread malicious lies"

Once more I'll waste my time and ask you to provide some detail of these lies.

This appears to be the sum total of your input screaming its all lies but unable to show the lies. It's a great but filthy game you play and on the positive side, readers can judge who has the most credibility!

The more you claim lies without providing evidence the more you look like a manic and desperate ramper.

Keep it up sonny, it does wonders for my credibility, thank you

Mickeydj:

You need to commiserate with Maidit, he bought lorry loads of In-spirit shares. Beguiled by fantastic technology, seduced by the big numbers. Sucked in to the rich man's world of share trading; eventually blown out the other side with nothing.

What is so fantastical he's here being sucked in again.

Mickeydj:

Still waiting discover how I know you have significantly more than 5k invested here. Am I the seventh son of a seventh son ?

Let's think a bit further, you posting history is virtually all QBT, so this we can surmise is not part of a nicely balanced portfolio. Another step, it's your one big investment. You've gone and made a terrible error of judgement. Not only have you piled too much money into this, you also did not fully understand the technology of Bitcoin mining.

What have you done, you've made a very bad mistake.