Member Info for Phimx

It is obvious the weight of common sense and failure of Gardin to deliver a detailed and clear presentation has tipped the balance in the sceptics favour.

I don't advocate people selling but I will suggest you think long and hard before buying more.

I just marvel at the IQ and common sense of some posters here.

They actually think I am trying to force the price down so I can buy cheaper because as we all know the SP is going to rocket, QBT will be worth billions!

So you think I’m here quibbling about 0.7 pence when the share price is shortly going to rocket to what ? Perhaps it will go to 20p or 50p a pound maybe possibly more. I for one think this would be a moronic strategy since the ‘big’ RNS could drop at any time, maybe after lunch or this afternoon. If it did I would miss out on the mega rise while trying to haggle the price down to 0.6p or 0.5p. Seems more like a game of chicken!

Reality is obviously not one of your investment tools

So revenue didn't happen due to porting problems. Presumably to be able to say revenue in 2024 paying customers were lined up and waiting, no further discussions needed.

Why wasn't revenue in 2025 a formality when porting was completed ?

Scotwins: You post

" Here’s one, why not prove QBT are not in talks with 2 ASIC chip manufacturers for method C and are not in talks with 2 x miners for methods A&B."

Trying to prove negatives is very difficult but apart from that Gardin has been in discussions for about 2 years with the Chinese and North Americans. He makes it difficult to decipher exactly what is happening, all part of the keep them guessing and arguing amongst themselves routine.

Time will tell, I'll wait my turn !

Pepermartinez:

Seems like a wonderful strategy, you must be rich already!

Scottwins:

I don't lie and I don't tell people to sell.

As for the claims made by the Gardin, by which investors money hangs, RNS are definitely not a reliable indicator of what will happen in the future. Gardin has several discredited RNS to his history, the now renowned "revenue in 2024". This was simply words for the mugs based upon no commercially available product, a statement without substance behind it.

He's made great performance claims for Methods A and B but what are the latest figures he's spouted. What is the point of Method A when Method B beats it hands down - supposedly?

Buy more, fill your boots I say, keep Giving Gardin his big fat sack of money.

Scottwins:

The old short story, lost track of how many naive investors have slung that my way.

You can't even see the placing coming, now that's effectively one big short heading your way Scottwins.!

Scottwins: You post

" You will not post any private communication, or part thereof, from any other person, including from a member of the board of directors of a listed company. Such posts cannot be verified as true and could be deemed to be misleading."

I'm happy to say what I posted were my own words. Unfortunately Scottwins you are a fine example of a typical investor, blinded by pound signs and unable to heed their own common sense even when their investment continues to shrink. Forever dreaming that one day the news will come but it turns out to be another placing.

Time will tell, ignore your common sense at your cost.

Oldsharedog: You post

" So Phimx - your crusade over many months is just to prove your right on a share your NOT invested in, that is not plausible"

Fortunately OSD I have evidence in abundance. If you go to the In-spirit Energy board you will be able to read several thousand post I wrote there. As you can see I posted for approximately 9 years, a few months here is nothing!

I have endure years of insults and moronic posts but unfortunately for them I was correct. The project and company they ramped was nothing but a non-commercial project which raised perhaps 70 million to finance dreams and nothing else. All the RNS promising great things were empty words, discussions were left high and dry, testing proved nothing.

I see exactly the same here, another one-man band pocketing big money for nothing.

INSP didn't answer emails either !

Oldsharedog:

Knowing I'm right and eventually being proved right!

Mickydj:

You are scrapping the barrel now. The company is 𝗻𝗼𝘁 replying, that is the unfortunate truth and verified by several people including 'genuine holders'

Your not going to change the trajectory of this 'folly'

Gardin doesn't have answers.

Mickydj: You post

" If you are a genuine investor, reach out to the board, ask them your questions. They are NOT hiding from anyone."

Perhaps that is true but there seems to be no doubt they aren't replying to emails nor can they be bothered to acknowledge receipt of emails. Pretty shoddy for a courtious outfit.

Oldsharedog:

Either you or Mickydj are misleading everyone cos he says

" If you are a genuine investor, reach out to the board, ask them your questions. They are NOT hiding from anyone."

Perhaps the world class QBT team have ran you through a search algorithm and discarded you as non-genuine

Mickeydj: You post

" If you are a genuine investor, reach out to the board"

What is a genuine investor ?

I suggest everyone here send questions to QBT, they can't differentiate shareholders from non-shareholders.

Perhaps better, Foggy could a Q & A session, to allay shareholders growing doubt about the safety of their investment. Perhaps a couple of his world class team could add some clarity as to why 43% is not the true improvement to Method C hashing rate improvement.

Mickeydj: You post

" If you are a genuine investor, reach out to the board, ask them your questions. They are NOT hiding from anyone"

But we've already heard how enquiries have not been replied to. Why haven't QBT replied to others and only to you.

Has anyone ever had a reply to an email enquiry ???

Mickeydj: You post

" I have also had my most recent questions answered in detail"

I dont remember anyone else having received replies from QBT but you want us to believe that you have no trouble. I don't believe you have received any detailed replies to anything. I don't think Gardin would be able to provide detailed replies to any searching questions for 2 reasons.

He has yet to provide any detailed information of worth on any subject.

Virtually all detail would be subject to: insider information, IP, NDA, commercial confidentiality.

Scottwins: You post

" Good grief, good job most know how trading agendas work is all I’m going to say."

Is that because you have no idea also?

Oldsharedog: You post

" I’m sure it will come back to bite you soon"

Better to show you're unafraid of the dog, it's bite is toothless!

Oldsharedog: You post

" I’ve always found that being prolific is better than being pathetic."

Congratulations, you've managed to achieve both with your recent posts.

Co

Probably what too much drink and too much time on your hands does for you!