RE: Hires14 Apr 2021 10:42
Maybe Whirlaw, but aren’t we back to question of whether they would need to hire 3 senior members of staff in order to analyse & bid on licenses?
That would seem a bit premature to me, and they could use contractors until they’ve secured something. Not only would they be adding significant cost to their monthly cash burn, but there would be no guarantee of success either.
And as somebody else pointed out, which senior geologist/geoscientist/reservoir engineer would want to join a shell with no assets? They could be out of a job in no time for a start.
My guess is they’ve agreed a deal but are now getting the legal and financial work done behind the scenes and are recruiting in preparation for that deal (or deals) being done.
The job application deadline is 21st April and I think they will want to explain their exact plans to applicants (if they want to secure good ones). That’s why I think we should see news next week or the week after, but I have to admit there is nothing happening in the market to back up that view. Very little appetite to buy shares for a number of days now, so I could be wrong but only time will tell.
Wonder if daveri has a theory on why there was no RNS on Tuesday...