Member Info for parkez

Looking at that holdings list...wheres the nominee accounts?
ie, us..the pi holdings?
Must be very little in pis hands?

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/ubs.asp

Thank you SM

UBS?
Sorry I must have missed the TR1...or other proof of this statement.
Please educate me. Thank you.

Looking at those printed late trades.
Quite possible NO trades actually took place. Apart from maybe the one.
Appears all the trades were cancelled.

Tells me that word has spread from the companies with knowledge of funder.
News must be imminent.

Thats why I asked...
Only way he could fill that today is a off book trade...which means he is not a pi...or the person/ ompany doing the trade is not.
My opinion only.
Of course further explanation would be welcome.

WOW,
Was waiting for his response before judging.

Exo15,
68 trades?
Just out of curiosity and a willingness to learn, how were they reported. All buys?..individually?
Final amount trade,average price?
Thanks.

Loc123,
Thanks.

Good old investing.com says UT at 16.35...that sets the closing sp.
Looking good for tomorrow even if no news
Will open at.least 6 %up.
Of course just my opinion.

Why did the sp finish at 0.52 when the last trades were going through at 0.55.?
Looking for the UT...but that many trades could not find it if there is one?
Again looking at the trades...people know, simple as. That trading is incredible volume,even more so considering most will be unaware until later that SYME is back.
News very imminent I'm thinking.

Does anyone else think the fact the rns was released at 3pm and the.large volume indicates a rns in the morning?

Hmm, a little touchy Marlene.
Have another glass, might calm you down.
Or maybe not hey!

Sorry I disagree.
If this turns out to be a con...you did not get it wrong, you was conned!!
A very big difference imo.
When you invest in a company, you do so because you have done your research and you trust the ceo....
TRUST, you understand the meaning?
If you do not trust you do not invest, if you trust...you believe.
Its not getting it wrong...its being conned.
Understand the difference.

"Potential that we got it wrong"?
NOT the way I see it if this doesn't come back....when a ceo says demand is huge...they have funding...I would see it has being conned, took for a ride,swindled.However you want to describe I
If the ceo is telling porkies, its just simply not getting it wrong!
Let's hope he's true to his word...as I am confident he is.

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/MTV/motive-sells-documentary-to-the-bbc-oecdoxqzz69s94c.html

"Motive TV ireland the film maker, does not appear to have been anything to do with this mtv. No link".....

i,m glad you said "appear"....because as you see there obviously is.

"Motive's patented technology is uniquely suited to address this problem by enabling content reception via both the Internet and the digital broadcast network, regardless of the Internet bandwidth availability."

KIPPER.....explanation please?

Its been hell of a long time since MTV went into admin...normally the passing of time would provide the conclusive answers....yet there are still more questions than answers.
Why no closure from administrators.
Why was Eyetime Systems incorporated who purchased MTV ip for £500k+ and still nothing heard from them.
Will we have answers in another 5 years...or another 5 months?

IS mtv tech tech obsolete....or ahead of its time and waiting?

Kipper is quite correct when he says everything is streaming these days..
However my experience of this is not good...
i go on my phone to watch a film...theres buffering
I go on my pc to watch football theres buffering
At work if i watch football without wifi i,m constantly aware of my data usage.
Streaming is here BECAUSE there is nothing better available currently.
ATSC 3.0 will be a huge success of that i have no doubt.
Whicheveer phone manufacturer installs the atsc 3.0 chip first will see a massive increase in sales....ATSC 3.0...."the bridge"!
Anyone find/kept the article written by Dr Glen Ritchie Craib of MTV. Cant find it would be interesting to read again.

From 09/12/2015 rns..
"The Internet is not yet sufficiently pervasive and reliable in South Africa to be able to provide continuous connectivity to the tablets. Motive's patented technology is uniquely suited to address this problem by enabling content reception via both the Internet and the digital broadcast network, regardless of the Internet bandwidth availability."
Kipper can you explain this please?

What i will say is from the patents i have looked at and the non transferable licensing agreements they involve a t pod....and the software inside?
Will this be obsolete if the Sinclair chip is fitted to phones?

Agreed,
And that is the question that bugs me...why develop something that is being developed already.
Unless you had someone who was not going to use the other developed service but wanted their own.