RE: NO FID in 202426 Oct 2023 10:47
Godders / Decidedleaverage says: "May I remind everyone that HRB / pmo / rkh must have completed feed 4 times already to no avail"
So good to have such an experienced project management expert like Godders / Decidedleaverage to help us.
Clearly hasn't a bloody clue about managing a project of this size, in a new and very remote area, with a potentially hostile neighbour to take into consideration.
For example, while PMO probably did a lot of worthwhile work, the Navitas team would have had to review all of it to extract anything useful for their new SL project, as it's clear that PMO/Harbour were never going to make it work, as they floundered.
Navitas have been applying that to their new approach to the project, to produce their own FEED - they would not simply have reused PMO material to come up with a similar FEED, because PMO/HBR had already realised they couldn't get the right answers.
I imagine one objective set by Navitas BoD would have been review all cost options to be able to produce the maximum oil from SL, as soon as possible, at the lowest cost, without introducing any potential H&S issues and meeting ever tightening ecological constraints in a pristine region.
A very difficult challenge, to come up with a credible proposal, which will attract funding.
And Godders / Decidedleaverage stands on the side lines shouting about something he admits he has no experience of - what a wally.