19 days last time so somewhere around the 27th for possible TD. BBN put up a very reasonable looking candidate timeline. You may want to go back through his posting history and find it.
Bushwackers - the board seems somewhat intent on ripping itself apart this morning. Please take a step back and ask if what you are about to post is helpful or not.
Sure we know we suffer the odd influx of undesirable detritus from time to time and yes - I'm sure I can be and have been as guilty as anyone for stamping down hard on perceived trouble makers.
We are entering the next phase of the development of our great little company - wea re going to see new investors attracted by the story and yes - we are going to attract more of the nefarious types too. Can I please ask that we try and keep our dignity a bit more and remember that this story is now unstoppable, it will unfold positively and there will be many many very good days ahead.
It is important to consider the cons as well as the pros. Thise with longer memories will remember a SWOT analysis that was done some time back - I have maintained that and updated it along the way. I'd be worried about giving it an airing on here at the moment but none the less I find it a sensible tool for continually assessing the robustness of this investment.
I'm not looking for a response or a ruck but I would ask everyone to thnk before posting just a little bit. Thanks
RE: Australia going with the flow17 Nov 2019 14:56
Give it a rest @Sharesaplenty. This stuff has a t10 lifetime of about a year VRFB goes 30+ Trying to surreptitiously seed some Vanadium alternative world for Flow Batteries isn't going to work.
RE: Australia going with the flow17 Nov 2019 14:24
interesting - on yesterdays evidence, I would have been surprised if our recent life sciences seer could even spell chemistry. Today we're seemingly commenting on it from a position of knowledge.
Just to get a more useful heading back. My 30 years finishing as a senior director at the top of an R&D organisation taught me it is NEVER the loud, pushy, attention seekers who bring anything of value to the game.
@Sharesaplenty - I see you were unable to follow a suggestion and wait until Monday to bring sensible thought out questions. If you genuinely are a scientist then you're a pretty ropey one based on todays nonsense. Q - how does a VRFB actually work ? (clue the V part is quite important) what is the Acid doing there at all ? (clue Vanadium salts are not water soluble) What would happen if you used Phosphoric acid (clue it would get pretty gungy). Please tone it down and reel it in a bit you're only managing to convince people more that you are actually Capa trying to push useful posts down the board.
@sharesaplenty - IF you are genuine, you are not helping your case with this yap yap yap. Go do some proper research - it's easy to do and find info. If you really are from a scientific background then you will easly be able to formulate sensible, informed, balanced questions to pose. Right now you sound just like every other Johnny come lately Friday afternoon knocker we've been plagued by for months. My very strong suggestion to you is don't post again today, do some research and if you have real questions, come back and pose them next Monday. Between now and then any answers you may need are not going to make a material difference to your investment strategy for waiting a few hours, however, your credentials as a genuine potential future contributor will be massively enhanced. Just a suggestion in case you really are genuine.
@gkb47 - just because you missed your entry, there's no need to talk utter Bollux - I know you do it well and regularly but really c'mon a placing. That is so weak. If you're going to de-ramp please - we're so past this entry level bull, you must do better to stay on the team