We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Well Yoy comparisons is about right. It all follows the trend in car sales which currently reports on a typical poor 3 month set of figures. Compare that against the background sales:
https://www.am-online.com/data/manufacturer-insight
I just wish SEE's internal PR could better prepare what was blatantly obvious. You would increase sales if all the market is expecting lower sales, next quarter will be different as its a better period.
Scope for future growth?
PMG could start with the GM $7 million deal. The models in production already must be threatening this. We know 40,000 units were sold to Dec 2022 (see link below) and the number of individual models are rising from 14 to 22 by the end of this year so must bust the $7m lifetime revenue in North America alone. A little PR around this one contract will do wonders, on top of actually new “News”.
https://gmauthority.com/blog/2022/12/gm-built-more-than-40000-super-cruise-equipped-vehicles-so-far/
Seeing-2020, I think I could say the same back to you! What I meant was that people are failing to catch onto the importance of Terry's posts of late NOT a critisism of his excellent work. Was not really intended as a criticism of any posters here, just prompting them to re-read. perhaps I just did not write it correctly!
Sometimes this BB really confuses me by missing the importance of certain posts. Recently 2 posts of Terry’s received just 3 thumbs up! I don’t think people are understanding the magnitude of what the independent words are saying.
3 Nov 2023 10:58 – This is a massive endorsement of SEE over SEYE. This means that BMW could not get SEYE software to improve enough so they switched to SEE. “The improved Driver Assistant Pro package”, just go back and read his post again.
2 Nov 2023 21:04 - a similar theme to the above
If you cannot get enthusiastic by this with BMW then just try a bit of Googling, understanding our software is going into ALL BMW models, then find out how many cars BMW sells in any one year times by a very conservative $10 per car …. you do the maths!
27 Oct 2023 21:24 – please revisit this report. This is a direct endorsement of SEE through independent tests, sure that also includes the ADAS element of the software, however bad DMS would drag the scores down. The top 3 are all SEE, while the very best SEYE offering could only manage fourth with BMW’s previous software. While Tesla is well down that list.
25 Oct 2023 08:44 – sigh, I give up!
Ask yourselves why any company would not want their Medium and Higher end cars to end cars to be downrated by software alone!
At some point in the near future all these director buys will also pay off for us as well. I suspect they know what is coming, possibly from Magna as their communication with shareholders is not so restricted by NDA. When that RNS drops new investors will look in and they will see a sea of Director buys and I suspect cause quite a jump in the SP. Despite the trip below 5p I am very optimistic about a re-rate this year.
Can anyone imagine posting on a Share thread that you have no financial interest in? Posting throught the day, some evenings and even into the night? I cannot imagine the depth of such an unhealthy obsession. What drives people to obsess over a POV when they have no financial interest? Weird as hell.
As I get older people surprise me with their oddities more and more. I sort of understand the ex-holder being bitter and twisted, well sort of, but to have zero skin in the game and spend so many hours of your life wasting time only to be ignored by so many is just nuts.
Baxter you have no-one but yourself to blame. I remember a time when the SP here was seriously down and you posted extremely negatively, so negatively I and a couple others were worried for your safety. Happy that my fears were unfounded. Then the SP rose to 12p why on earth did you not sell? Seriously, you did get in such a bad headspace, to not sell anywhere in double figures was a serious error, your error. However you chose to stay in this share despite some serious world problems that have hit this and many other sectors.
I actually agree PMG has not delivered on claims made in interviews and he needs to stop if ever he wants to be a CEO once this gets taken over. Misleading investors with false claims is not cool, however the BIG deals done with Magna etc really is to his eternal credit, getting the collaborations he has secured will pay out in time with this company and those patient enough to wait. DMS providers are on the cusp of good times driven by timescales, and I hope (nay expect) SEE to secure a patient 30% + share of the market by the same quiet tactics that are currently driving us nuts.
You are wasting your time. Everything he says about SEE is ill researched or wrong, so he is nothing more than a troll. A troll you are feeding (like I am now lol) and encoraging him to post ever increasinly daft items about DMS. Just laugh and know no-one takes any notice of the poor fool - well apart from the person he talks with in the mirror. OR just filter the fool.
Correct Johnny, but at least Cenkos were a little bit researchable py PI's. How hard is it to address both aspects as a part of the Investing market? SM are paying them to represent the company and can IF they wish make parts of the research / conclusions available to PI's.
Number 2 is pointless - Car manufacturers are in charge not PMG. PMG may know what he has bid for, what he is likely to win and roughly when but details are upto CM's.
There is one point he can clarify - Why Stifl? Does he realise how poor they are for PI's? Can he encourage them to be a little more PI friendly?
Why even bother to reply to the fool (as an Oldfool I get to be able to call someome that)? He gets a 'ard on every time you mention his name! Just let him look the un-researched fool that he has already done this morning. Anyone that has researched SEE understands where the 40% comes from and what it represents, therefore anyone who has researched SEE will be able to laugh at the fool blaming the wrong person. Every time he mentions anything about SEE he gets it all wrong, no need to correct him. Anyone wanting to read his BS and not research deserves to sell and lose money anyway. I'm afraid the latest Troll is a rather poor example.
I have been holding a lot of my shares in SEE but as I said before sold quite a bit on general market scares, back in March 22 at 8p. Closed that loop this afternoon buying back in at 5.38p. Not claiming its the bottom but I reckon close enough for me. I also think the time is right for SEE's SP performance to change.
I am probably off the ball on this but who are Mobileye using for DMS? I know SEE and ME announced a collaboration for aftermarket but are they dual sourcing?
The reason I ask is because of 2 seperate tempting articles. The first is this one: https://media.polestar.com/uk/en/media/pressreleases/673327/polestar-to-work-with-mobileye-on-autonomous-driving-technology-in-polestar-4 which resonates as though Polestar are making a change.
The second is harking back to Qualcomm's graphics linking Polestar and Seeing Nachines as named partners and not SEYE.
I wonder if we are due another Manufacturer switching DMS. That would be small business, but satisfying.
I can ignore daft comments but the replies that irritate me are those that feed the alternate reality, honestly why you people do not learn that engaging with trolls just feeds the fool within. You validate the opinion that everyone reads and just like the conversation with the man in the mirror outside this forum, it encourages more.
you miss the point dr. qualcomm produced the video before the weekend and profiled those 4 ****pits. in the maufacturers and suppliers listed was seeing machines, no mention of cipia or seye. why would they publish sm as a profiled supplier then show ****pits without in the same video?